|
lol, it crashed Firefox for me twice (both times were right after it listed my achievements at the end). I'm wondering if this is a bug or an "easter egg"
|
|
|
|
|
Haha, I actually like that angry Clippy in the back.
|
|
|
|
|
An anarchist group has offered internet giant Google a deal, give us $3bn and we will leave you alone. I'm sure they could get someone to get rid of them for less than $3billion
|
|
|
|
|
I can beat that price. I will leave them alone for $2 Billion.
|
|
|
|
|
They will be able to buy a lot of herbal tea with that.
(Because proper tea is theft).
((I'll get my coat))
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course if they were REALLY anarchists...
But nobody really is, of course.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly. If they were real anarchists, they wouldn't ask for any money at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Operators behind hundreds of thousands of websites apparently couldn't care less that they're running an unsupported operating system. Read the full article for the gem about the Australia Post. Gotta love governments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 websites are hosted on Windows 2000 servers So why care for those few XP "servers" - they are just about 1% of that number.
And on the other hand: "Linux" - how old are those Linux versions? That's just far harder to find out...
|
|
|
|
|
There's no way that number is that low.
|
|
|
|
|
maybe there is a confusion (what's new) between the number of servers and the number of websites.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Still though. I expect at least a couple more zeros on that.
|
|
|
|
|
The NASA Technology Transfer Portal contains data from all 10 NASA field centers and headquarters, enabling industry and the general public to find information about technology opportunities, licensing opportunities, and past success stories. "Pulsed ultrasonic stir welding system" At last! I've been looking for one of these.
Previously announced, now live.
|
|
|
|
|
We’d like you to meet Carousel: a gallery for all the photos and videos from your life. It combines the photos in your Dropbox with the photos on your phone, and automatically backs up new ones as you take them. "All I've got is a photograph, but it's not enough"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because the internet as a market place does not much prefer the first entrants (or originators) the only way to prevent a race to the bottom based off price is to ruthlessly buy every company that pops its head over the parapet.
|
|
|
|
|
There hasn't been such a build-up of pointless excitement since the Year 2000 bug threatened to destroy civilisation as we know it. Of course, Microsoft ending support for its aged and insecure Windows XP operating system never threatened anything like that, regardless of the XPocalypse-style billing. The real risks are in the longer term, and will probably affect large enterprises and governments. Or at least, those are the ones that will be reported.
RIP Windows XP
|
|
|
|
|
It's the end of the world as we know it...but I feel fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, to know what "XP" in "Windows XP" really means, we need a bit of a history lesson.
Way back in the 70's, Xerox came up with the idea of a mouse and graphical user interface (GUI).
Apple's Steve Jobs saw this GUI & mouse and stole hired engineers away from Xerox to create the Mac.
Clickity Proof[^]
Well, a few years later ol' Bill (of the Gates variety) saw the mousey & GUI and wanted his own rendition of it. But, alas, patents and prior art (first use) stood in the way. So, he struck a deal with Jobs on using some of the Mac interface in Windows 1.0.
Well, a few years later, Apple decided to sue both H.P. and Microsoft for copyright infringements. But, that $5 Billion lawsuit was awash for Apple. More Clickity Proof[^]
Well, a few years later, Xerox decides to sue Apple for copyright infringements. Suffice to say, the suit eventually got tossed. Even More Clickity Proof[^]
Well, we now get to jump 11 years ahead to 2001.
Apple intro's Mac OS X on March 24, 2001 .
Not wanting to feel left behind, Microsoft intros Windows XP on October 25, 200 1.
Now, most tech-heads will denote that the "X" in Mac OS X is a moniker for "Unix"; e.g., HP/UX, IBM A/IX, etc.
However, being a 10-year Apple veteran during that 80's & 90's era, my conclusion is to the contrary.
That "X" in Mac OS X really means "Xerox". For, Apple couldn't go on hiding what they really did ~ that being taking the idea from Xerox in the first place.
Low, and behold, Bill[ionaire] Gates wanted to set the record perfectly straight, which is why he had Microsoft use "XP", which stands for:
Xerox Plagiarized
|
|
|
|
|
With Dart SDK 1.3, we’ve improved performance of async code running in the Dart VM and made substantial improvements to dart:io. This results in some of our experimental HTTP benchmarks now running at more than twice the speed of the previous release. Assuming better performance is something of interest
|
|
|
|
|
As much as I like the idea of Dart, I wish for once they would use benchmarks that are not completely biased.
|
|
|
|
|
You do realize they were comparing the performance with a previous version of Dart?
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
And that previous performance was measured by in-house Google benchmarks. Not disputing them, simply stating the Dart team would do well to allow some independent third-party benchmarking.
|
|
|
|
|
Why? It may make sense when comparing between languages, but they're simply measuring the improvement in their own VM - its not in their interest to deceive themselves (or us).
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|