|
The solution is to realise that work isn't stressful unless you are a soldier under fire!
|
|
|
|
|
nice statement
Sankarsan Parida
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: find the root, the cause, and to eliminate it
This can often get you to a prison...
--
"My software never has bugs. It just develops random features."
|
|
|
|
|
The cause, not the person.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
The cause, not the person.
Have you met my boss? He IS the cause!
|
|
|
|
|
This message needs to show your boss
Sankarsan Parida
|
|
|
|
|
|
WiganLatics wrote: Have you met my boss? He IS the cause! Let's try that again. The fact that the person exists does not cause problems, does it?
Now I can imagine someone taking dumb decisions. I have done so often enough. Out of ignorance, fear, pressure, being in love, whatever. Find the cause, and you might be able to do something about it.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
If a person exists or not exists that does not matter.
If we have our work, jod duty then there is problem.
If you have nothing to do then there is no problem for you.
And this is your life.
But we have to manage in a meaningful way. So work stress is a part of that.
Sankarsan Parida
|
|
|
|
|
I think the cause is naked ambition and disregard for anything except his wallet
|
|
|
|
|
sankarsan parida wrote: Space out
Yup, that's my favorite way.
But really, I only need one way managing work related stress, and that's (no, it's not what you're thinking, take your dirty mind elsewhere) to find different work! (But yeah, the other way is good too.)
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
These days, hackers steal passwords wholesale, not one by one, which is why you can ignore outdated password practices. OK, my new password is 'a'. Please don't tell anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been saying that for years. Crackers using a brute-force attack will never try single-character passwords.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow - thanks for the tip - I've changed my prog to start at one character now
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
|
My passwords is always, click on 'Forgotten you password?' link.
|
|
|
|
|
My neighbour ask me for my wifi password, i told him "from 0 to 9", he tried "0123456789" but no luck , and my real password is "from0to9"
In code we trust !
|
|
|
|
|
It has nothing to do with the complexity of your password, but the way it stored. Hackers able to steal because morons store it as plain text!!!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
In the worst (and all too often) case, yeah. However, even a secured table can be cracked with rainbow tables[^]. Assuming they can download the data, of course.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: However, even a secured table can be cracked with rainbow tables[^].
Not unless you're doing it wrong. If you salt the hashed password using a unique salt per password, it renders rainbow tables useless, as you'd have to recalculate them for each password.
Of course, if you pick the "wrong" hashing algorithm, a GPU will be able to crack the passwords in next to no time anyway:
http://www.troyhunt.com/2012/06/our-password-hashing-has-no-clothes.html[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I had a server with a password of "ASecret" just for the pleasure it gave me when someone asked for the password & I could tell them "It's a secret"
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: plain text No, you are wrong. Why don't you understand that the password is UTF-8 encrypted?
|
|
|
|
|
The practice is not outdated, on the contrary. There's a thread on a mask-attack in the C# forum.
If you ignore the warnings, then you can just as well ignore locking the door completely. The worst is that the suggestion is coming from a "security advisor"
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that the theory taught in schools is valuable after all, but only as a supplement to the practical skills. So, it is probably better to find a way to learn these practical skills first. Only after mastering these skills will the higher level theory taught in schools be useful.
...But the degree still helps.
|
|
|
|
|
Epoch Times wrote: Only after mastering these skills will the higher level theory taught in schools be useful. That's rubbish (IMHO).
But I do agree that simply having a degree in Computer Science maketh a software engineer not. Practical experience is necessary because it exposes the engineer to real-world issues which (for the sake of practicality) can only be glossed over in a classroom environment. This is why internships done while studying are of great value.
Aside: I've worked with several very proficient devs who don't have a CS degree but are more than able to carry their weight. And then some.
/ravi
|
|
|
|