|
Now you can finally get an answer on those strange error codes Better late than never?
|
|
|
|
|
So instead of googling the error code, now we download some tool that may or may not work (article mentions it's more for "basic problems") and still probably have to google the error code? Seems legit 
modified 22-Dec-16 10:51am.
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently, it will:
"Fix improperly configured security settings, or missing settings."
Yeah, right.
All your computer are belong to us.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
If problem persist contact your system administrator !
Zen and the art of software maintenance : rm -rf *
Maths is like love : a simple idea but it can get complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is officially asking the public for help heading off a looming threat to information security: quantum computers, which could potentially break the encryption codes used to protect privacy in digital systems. Isn't that... their job?
|
|
|
|
|
no to give you simple answer its like one head is good but two is better
|
|
|
|
|
FYI, FIPS 186-4 is Digital Signature Algorithm - Wikipedia[^], which uses SHA1/2 to sign items. NIST SP 800-56A/B are about key distribution, I can't find a dumbed down explanation but from the NIST[^] Documents[^] introductions and tables of contents I think these are about using RSA/etc to distribute the symmetric keys used for the remainder of a session. Interestingly enough the NIST 800-56 family also has a C version[^] not referenced in the original article...
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
The latest Microsoft Security Intelligence Report shows an increase in the use of anti-virus software following the introduction of Windows Defender, and highlights the extra security improvements in Windows 10 It's in the box?
|
|
|
|
|
Apple has accused Nokia of working with patent trolls to spawn lawsuits. How to fund your company's comeback
|
|
|
|
|
If you live by the sword...
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So exceptions should be exceptional, unusual or rare, much like a asteroid strike!! It's right there in the name
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, a Fortran Web Framework "Finally" is not quite the word that came to mind
|
|
|
|
|
Why would be more the word!
Somebody has too much time on their hands.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
Fortran was around before I even got into programming 13 years ago. I hate the "newest libraries" as much as anyone (without merit of course), but good lord - let it die already.
|
|
|
|
|
While not a fan, I recognise FORTRAN's dominance in the field of numerical computing.
So far, nothing matches its ability at number crunching from simple to understand code. Why would its users adopt something inferior for their purposes.
I feel much the same about COBOL (although I detest it considerably more). Considering that there is 30 year old COBOL code still running, which modern language would you be willing to rewrite that in and take a bet on it being such a good investment?
It's very easy to criticise, much harder to be constructive.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
I recognize FORTRAN's ability in structured, array-based numerical computing. That's what it's good at. But why in the world would you build a web framework with it?
Side note: the Fortran.io link shows a "502 bad gateway" now. I find this both amusing and relevant 
modified 22-Dec-16 10:52am.
|
|
|
|
|
But how relevant is the book to the concerns of web development eight years after it was published? Because you can't write clean code in JavaScript?
Yup, headline in the form of a question. You know how that goes.
|
|
|
|
|
full-stack JavaScript application
Any combination of those words just makes we want to
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Because you can't write clean code in JavaScript?
Admit it, it's worse than VB3.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Because you can't write clean code in JavaScript?
Should be a Christmas wish list for this week survey saying.
Please Santa, let my js code work for once and for all, no bug and be work any version of AngularJS, JQuery, BackBone, ...[name all the js frameworks here] 
|
|
|
|
|
I read that book years ago and really disliked it. I thought it poorly written, often self-contradicting and, worst of all, dogmatic.
Unfortunately, "his" good ideas are lost in the clutter of "his" bad ones and "his" religious-like ferver. (His in quotes since several chapter were written by other people, hence some of the inconsistency.)
|
|
|
|
|
The employee, who goes by the name of John Doe for privacy reasons, has filed a lawsuit against Google because he believes that the company’s confidentiality policies, which include an internal “spying program”. Google? Spying? Really?
|
|
|
|
|
The line which got me:
"...employees are even forbidden from discussing possible legal violations with the company’s legal advisors..."
|
|
|
|
|
From a less maliciously clickbaity site:
The lawsuit alleges that Google warns employees to not put into writing concerns about potential illegal activity within Google, even to the company’s own attorneys, because the disclosures could fall into the hands of regulators and law enforcement.
... which puts a less malicious spin on this particular item and reduces it to ligation CYA. It's almost certainly derived from the whOracle litigation; where one of the biggest clubs whOracle was using was an email from an Android Developer saying: "I think we need a license from Sun to do this."
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
