|
Step 1 for the "Armageddon" theory... check
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
How the Lunar Laser Retroreflector, still operating 50 years later, ended up going to the moon. Mirror, mirror on the moon; how did you get there: by gull or balloon?
I'm assuming the moon landing deniers either deny it's actually there, or that it was somehow placed without human intervention?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: it was somehow placed without human intervention
Astral projection?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Scientists have unveiled the first photograph ever captured of quantum entanglement, the physical phenomenon in which two or more “entangled” particles are connected via their quantum states, even across vast distances. Spooky!
|
|
|
|
|
OK, this a subject of interest to me, but I have to look into this more, because "taking a photograph of it" sounds remarkably like bullsh1t.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The Justice Department is now considering the settlement, the Wall Street Journal reports I guess they'll have to put up more advertisements to make this up
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Friday, legendary MIT computer scientist Fernando “Corby” Corbató passed away at his home in Newton, Massachusetts. He was 93. His first password (123456) will now be retired
|
|
|
|
|
Gh7%^tge nmd7Loj Nk40 887H4 jn iHi4 Ut fnek* tosnmg8(
And that's all I have to say, in this sad circumstance.
Good luck decrypting it: it uses a decades-old standard that was obviously "not good enough".
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Good luck decrypting it: it uses a decades-old standard that was obviously "not good enough". root13 ?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: root13 ? Slightly later than that.
Rot13.2
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Just in case you were holding out any hope that Google didn’t let humans listen to voice recordings from Google Home and Google Assistant, stop doing that. Everyone else very angry Google let contractors handle the Assistant recordings
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Everyone else very angry Google let contractors handle the Assistant recordings But there will be very few / little to no consequences... as usual
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Google very angry for losing the "most evil" title, even if only temporarily.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if, and in what measure, Google is breaking any privacy laws.
What I do know is that the contractor is breaking some contractual agreements and probably also some privacy laws.
I can only assume that his contracting days are over and if it were up to me he'd do some jail time and pay a hefty fine for intentionally sharing confidential and private data.
I'm not even sure what this idiot tried to get out of it because it was apparently already known that humans listen to audio recordings (although it's now more widely known).
If this were a small company it could ruin them, the fact that it's Google should not matter in that regard.
I get that Google is angry, and I would be too.
For once, I'm on Google's side.
|
|
|
|
|
Facebook releases Hermes to improve app performance on low-end Android phones. Because you never know when you might want to bolt a JavaScript engine into something?
|
|
|
|
|
Hermes is the god of, among other things, thieves and trickery.
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Woodbury wrote: thieves and trickery You might have a translation error, there.
I have a feeling that it could translate to "utter bollocks".
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Details of the Cloudflare outage on July 2, 2019[^]
LinkedIn said: July 2 outage that left thousands of websites and services like Shopify, Zendesk, Dropbox and Nest out of commission for part of the day.
CloudFlare said: The CPU exhaustion was caused by a single WAF rule that contained a poorly written regular expression that ended up creating excessive backtracking. The regular expression that was at the heart of the outage is
(?:(?:\"|'|\]|\}|\\|\d|(?:nan|infinity|true|false|null|undefined|symbol|math)|\`|\-|\+)+[)]*;?((?:\s|-|~|!|{}|\|\||\+)*.*(?:.*=.*)))
Q: Now, who'da thought a little ol' RegEx could cause such harm?
A: All the devs who've ever experienced backtracking in a "simple" RegEx.
modified 14-Jul-19 12:05pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Given that this has bitten the bum of any high load application that uses regular expressions (it's hit us, it's hit StackOverflow, it's hit many), I'm surprised there aren't more automated tools to spot this stuff.
The .NET regex library has a timeout option (which can short circuit catastrophic backtracks and at least let you get on with things) but it would be nice to have something a little more specific than merely "this took a long time". A "I'm doing exactly the same thing 100 million times ya great nong!" exception would be great.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I had a very simple RegEx in a WinForms app that was supposed to simply help the user by letting her know that the field didn’t seem like a valid URL.
It worked great until it didn’t.
I was lucky because mine only bothered one user at a time.
I would be very afraid to have a RegEx in a place where an entire site was dependent upon it. I don’t trust none of them RegExes.
|
|
|
|
|
maybe they did not write any test cases for this regular expression
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: .*(?:.*=.*)
Oh no no no
|
|
|
|
|
Jamie Zawinski wrote: Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use regular expressions." Now they have two problems.
|
|
|
|
|
Fantastic quote!!! Nailed it!
|
|
|
|