|
Samsung’s Galaxy Note 10 has more Microsoft in it than any other Android phone It's almost like they have a common enemy or something
|
|
|
|
|
I hear that the project name is iHaventGotAClue.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
why do I have the impression, that this is going to be a big step back and a PITA for the users?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I doubt it. I have their Note 8, and use their SideSync program to mirror the phone on the computer, and it works great! (You can see notifications, open programs, type through the computer onto the phone, transfer files... - almost anything you want except talk through the computer to the phone, although you can dial from the computer.) The changes they presented appear to mostly be Samsung turning the code over to MS (which could seriously screw it up), but if they keep the existing base intact, it will be usable and worthy.
Who am I kidding. It's MS. They will screw it up somehow.
|
|
|
|
|
David O'Neil wrote: The changes they presented appear to mostly be Samsung turning the code over to MS (which could seriously screw it up), but if they keep the existing base intact, it will be usable and worthy.
Who am I kidding. It's MS. They will screw it up somehow. Roll eyes |
I see you got the point
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's one of the reasons I stopped buying Samsung mobile devices, they are full of bloatware and you can get cheaper devices that are as good as Samsung's upper end products.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
“It’s a vulnerability that allows a malicious user to create fake news and create fraud,” Mr Vanunu explained. Someone's gonna love this
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
If they made such a tool for editing twitter "contributions", guess how much use it would get from a certain-coloured person who lives in a certain-coloured house.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Donald Trump wrote: This is exactly the sort of thing that can happen on Code Project.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Calgary YouTuber Ben Perrin decided to have some fun after fraudster reached out “Qui furatus fuerit fures?”
I wanted to go with “who scams the scammers?”, but seeing as how this is bitcoin, it’s hard to tell which is which.
|
|
|
|
|
In a new pair of papers, researchers from MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) have come up with a new approach to streamline the process: a new system and design tool for automating knitted garments. I'm assuming it was written in Perl?
|
|
|
|
|
Let me guess, they use yarn to manage the dependencies? Probably uses a command line interface for any updates which is all the rage these days. No doubt they call that cli-MIT change.
|
|
|
|
|
They can take care of the "perl one", I'll handle the "stroke one", as many times as I can for all the babes they're going to put out of work.
I'm beginning to be in favour of AI-generated code.
If the people who write the code that puts other people out of work felt their pain, they might actually switch their brains to the "I'm not a self-absorbed, uncaring @rsehole!" mode.
If the only way to make them feel that pain is AI-generated code, then I'll stop working on generating useful AIs, and focus on hurting w@nkers who don't give a toss about the repercussions of the code they write.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Now, here's something that's real spaghetti
|
|
|
|
|
Putting grandmothers everywhere out of the cheesy sweater business.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
I’m seeing thousands of return null statements in recent code reviews. Yes, I know you’ll find my fingerprints on some of that code, but as my mom used to say: "live and learn". Never say never again!
Between shocks and nulls, I guess that's the theme for today. As a bonus crossover event - "Never say never again" was a remake of "Thunderball". (close enough to lightning?)
These are the things that keep us alive some days.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, so null != cubed russet potatoes, julienned baby carrots, and diced red onions.
OK, got it.
Thanks, Pal.
nerf
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The guy’s an idiot. You do what’s appropriate for the situation. If a null return value is warranted, then by the hounds of hell, return a f*ckin null.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I seem to write a lot of methods that return an IEnumerable<T> where I use 'yield return' ... what else would I use when there are no T's to return ? default(T) is going to fail, or give me an instance.
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, but,
using: yield return Enumerable.Empty<T>
would require the return type of the Function to be:
IEnumerable<IEnumerable<T>>
and, in the context of Linq enumeration, return without yield will result in an error.
And, that would mean you could not use yield return someinstanceofT; Keep in mind the context here is an Extension method using Linq enumeration to return an IEnumerable<T>
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
|
|
|
|
|
Right you are, think I was thinking about standard functions rather than ones that yield.
|
|
|
|
|
Either yield break; , or just return from the method without issuing any yield return ...; statements.
The caller will get back a non-null IEnumerable<T> instance which produces no elements.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Richard, while the result of 'yield return null' and 'yield break' are the same, and using 'break saves typing 6 characters ... somehow I find yielding 'null more ... uhhh ... mnemonic.
Richard Deeming wrote: return from the method without issuing any yield return given that I expect these methods to return stuff most of the time, there has to be some use of the 'yield statement, or you are going to hear the old song: "not all code paths ..." maybe I am missing the point you are making ?
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
|
|
|
|