|
No, but they seem particularly bad at it (see Node/Deno as one pretty extreme case, as well as Angular/Vue/React/Svelte/Next/Ember/probably forgetting a dozen here)
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: No, but they seem particularly bad at it (see ... No thanks, I already have enough with my own topics
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: A report ... highlighted a "clear need" for developers to dedicate more time to the security of FOSS projects as businesses and economies become increasingly reliant on open-source software. Hmmm. Maybe those 'businesses' should contribute to that effort (like the article said)...
|
|
|
|
|
Today, C may be a lingua franca among programmers. This is its (abridged) history. Columnist chronicles computer compiler creation caper
Goes back earlier than the story usually starts
|
|
|
|
|
DeepMind’s program, called AlphaFold, outperformed around 100 other teams in a biennial protein-structure prediction challenge called CASP, short for Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction. The results were announced on 30 November, at the start of the conference — held virtually this year — that takes stock of the exercise. The tool is getting perfectioned... now the real question is... how will it at the end be used?
To help the medicine and biochemistry?
Or
To create better bio-weapons?
a bit old, sorry
And sorry again, I could not come with a better comment
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: WASHINGTON — For years, the cybersecurity firm FireEye has been the first call for government agencies and companies around the world who have been hacked by the most sophisticated attackers, or fear they might be.
Now it looks like the hackers — in this case, evidence points to Russia’s intelligence agencies — may be exacting their revenge.
FireEye revealed on Tuesday that its own systems were pierced by what it called “a nation with top-tier offensive capabilities.” The company said hackers used “novel techniques” to make off with its own tool kit, which could be useful in mounting new attacks around the world. [^]
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A team of researchers in South Korea are developing an artificial “skin” that could allow soldiers to perfectly blend in with their surroundings. "She says the jungle... it just came alive and took him."
|
|
|
|
|
If only they can find the samples.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I could think of a reason it wouldn't work perfectly, if I put my mind to it...
Join RCWFT* today, for a better world tomorrow!
* Remove Conditional Words From Titles
|
|
|
|
|
But one idea seized upon by Microsoft hints at a very strange, if somewhat widely foreseen, future: chatbots that can mimic anyone if supplied with enough personal data. I barely want to chat with them now
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: Charlie Brooker should have patented the idea back in 2013
Technically, doesn't that mean that the idea is already in the public domain?
Then again, Microsoft's patent is probably specific enough, and nobody has enough $$$ to go up against all their obvious patents which should never have been granted to begin with.
I once did a patent application (can't remember for what, lol) and a few weeks later I received a letter from Microsoft's lawyer desk politely telling me I was infringing on one of their existing patents. It came with a form that was pre-filled out for withdrawing my patent application. All I had to do was sign it and mail it in. That was amusing.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure that this was done in scifi long before that, long before IM/chat in the modern form even.
But none of that stops overly obvious patent applications that should never be granted.
Anyway, patents for ideas and algorithms don't apply in the UK or EU, do they.
modified 10-Dec-20 5:03am.
|
|
|
|
|
Businesses might feel that if they're targeted cyber criminals once, it won't happen again - but analysis of incidents shows that more often than not, attackers come back looking for more. It's almost like they target the known vulnerable companies?!
|
|
|
|
|
"The hate for a language is directly proportional to the popularity, so the most hated also tends to be the most popular or the most threatening," said VMware's director of engineering. "And the haters gonna hate, hate, hate"
|
|
|
|
|
Another article by someone that tried to be a programmer, couldn't hack it, and now feels qualified to comment on the industry.
Nothing to see here...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Allclair, an Apple software engineer, who also helps oversee Kubernetes security, announced a “security issue was discovered with Kubernetes affecting multitenant clusters. There's a hole in the container, dear Liza, dear Liza
Good thing I still have no real idea what it does.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Good thing I still have no real idea what it does. Only because you are not using it, it doesn't mean that you are not going to be affected because of it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
We are excited to announce the public release of Infer#, which brings the interprocedural static analysis capabilities of Infer to the .NET community. "Is it safe?"
Aaaaaand now my teeth hurt.
|
|
|
|
|
Can we infer that I have no idea what Infer# and "interprocedural static analysis" is ?
|
|
|
|
|
Even after reading it, I'm fuzzy - other than it's not a fuzzer?
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
"Null Dereference
static void Main(string[]) args)
{
var returnNull = ReturnNull();
_ = returnNull.Value;
}
private static NullObj ReturnNull()
{
return null;
}
internal class NullObj
{
internal string Value { get; set; }
}" I would send the programmer who wrote this for drug testing.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|