|
Extended spellcheck features in Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge web browsers transmit form data, including personally identifiable information (PII) and in some cases, passwords, to Google and Microsoft respectively. Beewar uv hakkers fixign ur speling
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see a problem, at all.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for this article. I'm going to have our sites adjusted so that registration and login fields all have 'spellcheck="false"' added. This is a simple and effective solution to ensuring we don't inadvertently leak PII data to third parties.
|
|
|
|
|
The Las Vegas surgeon can lengthen patients' legs via a painful months-long process. Did people think "Gattaca" was a documentary?
Or aspirational?
|
|
|
|
|
As Del Spooner said: You have got to be the dumbest smart person I have ever met
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
A story in two parts:
1) Tech-bros.
2) Money with wings.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
|
Get ready for the catchy 'Intel Processor' badge instead. How about "386" - that still good?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: "386" - that still good?
Actually, it isn't. Intel originally changed from numbers to names (e.g. 80586 to Pentium) because numbers could not be trademarked.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if they’ll have trouble trademarking “Intel processor”?
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Article wrote: Get ready for the catchy 'Intel Processor' badge instead. Is badge the new icon?
I know, it is not MS, but I couldn't resist
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
My favorite "inside" is unbeaten, even if it is a few years old: Linux Inside[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if they got signoff from the OEMs this time or just don't care.
They tried to do this about a decade ago, shortly after the Core branding came out, but had to backpedal after Dell, HP, Acer, etc all threw tantrums because: "When shopping for cheap crappy race to the bottom computers our clueless customers 'know' that Pentium or Celeron badges mean it's a 'good' computer." 😭🤮
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
My goal is to explore whether there's a way we can evolve C++ itself to become 10x simpler, safer, and more toolable. Why create a new language, when you can just change the syntax of the old one?
|
|
|
|
|
Says the man who's added needlessly complicated features to C++
|
|
|
|
|
Herb Sutter wrote: My goal is to explore whether there's a way we can evolve C++ itself to become 10x simpler It sounds like he's trying to make it Basic.
|
|
|
|
|
He'd better hide, a certain codewitch we all know might come to kick his scrawny little backside.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
Open source developers are making the command line more friendly—and more powerful. We have to go forward - to the the past
|
|
|
|
|
Gotta make "rd <dir> /s" more powerful
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is this a bug, or a feature?
(Asking for a friend...)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: We have to go forward - to the the past Don't forget to get the list of wall street best pics for the 80ies...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Boffins at the University of Michigan in the US and Zhejiang University in China want to highlight how bespectacled video conferencing participants are inadvertently revealing sensitive on-screen information via reflections in their eyeglasses. Another reason to avoid Zoom meetings
""Our models and experimental results in a controlled lab setting show it is possible to reconstruct and recognize with over 75 percent accuracy on-screen texts that have heights as small as 10 mm with a 720p webcam." That corresponds to 28 pt, a font size commonly used for headings and small headlines." <- Time to stop working on your headlines during that team meeting?
|
|
|
|
|
It's far more interesting to see what porn they like.
|
|
|
|