|
Awesome! Thanks for the list.
Eh. If I can't manage to dedupe some hosts files then I need to hang it up as a programmer. I'll just bang that out in emacs.
|
|
|
|
|
OmniSharp is a family of Open Source projects, each with one goal - To enable great .NET development in YOUR editor of choice. Whatever happened to 'Embrace and Extinguish'?
|
|
|
|
|
MSFT are being Extinguished they lost the consumer market... and this is the LAST STRAW....pufft!!
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Is this along the same lines as sharpdevelop/[^]
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Don't think so. #Dev is a full IDE; Omnisharp appears to be bindings to do .net in sublime/emacs/vim/etc.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
This is the first full preview of what we used to call Visual Studio “14.” Even if you’ve been following the earlier CTPs, you’ll find some new things in here, including a new Visual Studio Emulator for Android and support for building Android applications using C++ based off of Clang and LLVM. So much Visual Studio. Many IDE. Wow.
|
|
|
|
|
A native Android emulator in Visual Studio? Wow indeed!
|
|
|
|
|
Are they actually going to release a VS2014, or are all the VS2014 CTPs going to end up like the Windows 96 previews MS did waaaay back in the day to various trademags?
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Today is a huge day for .NET! We’re happy to announce that .NET Core will be open source, including the runtime as well as the framework libraries. *That's* how they wrote that?
|
|
|
|
|
What a wonderful day! The Xplatform support announcement also has me rockin'!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure all days are about the same size.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice idea from the devs @ MSFT , dump all the code on GIT hub,say good bye to all the bugs they have to fix,and chat and play with their iPhones(now we are cross platfom) all day and collect the pay check !
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong.
Monday = 6 letters
Tuesday = 7 letters
(you get the idea)
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Holy cow, this is HUGE! That's amazing, I'm actually ecstatic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft just unveiled the first part of their WPF roadmap[^], and I'm now free to talk about it. Yes, the WPF Disciples have been giving feedback for you, and it's good to see that things are progressing. As more details become available, I will let you know.
|
|
|
|
|
An interesting step, but I'm not sure I'm convinced. The impression I get from that "roadmap" is that Visual Studio is getting some amazing updates for XAML/C# generally, but the WPF stack is getting a few bugfixes.
I wonder if they're going to keep improving WPF, or if they're just maintaining it while they push us to WinRT (Still XAML/C# as I understand it, but a different GUI framework). If the former, it'd be nice if they committed to that... If the latter, I'd like to see how difficult porting will be when it comes time to make the move.
|
|
|
|
|
Right now, all I can say, is that there are other features that are being talked about to improve WPF - although a greater interoperability between the WPF desktop stack and the RT stack shouldn't come as a surprise to you. The biggest push that we're aiming at, with MS right now, is improving the all round performance and there are some tricks from the trenches that we've fed back that will hopefully make it into the next release.
|
|
|
|
|
Ian Shlasko wrote: but the WPF stack is getting a few bugfixes
Come, join us MFC-ers to the dark cold caves of the forgotten. We have (cold) cupcackes.
|
|
|
|
|
So basically, the MFCers have cold cupcakes in their cave... The WinForms crowd has popcorn in a run-down apartment...
I'll stick with the WPF crowd... Cinnabons in the penthouse suite. Computationally expensive, and guaranteed to make you sick if you have too much, but it just tastes sooooo good.
|
|
|
|
|
What I'd like to see is WPF and the Windows Runtime XAML stack brought closer together. For example, if the Windows Runtime XAML framework could be used to write desktop applications and not just Windows Store apps, it would become far more attractive to me and I'd be less worried about the future of WPF. There's really no need to have two pretty similiar UI frameworks exisiting side-by-side, merging them in the mid-term only makes sense. Right now, I'm not convinced by the Store application model as it is too restricted in terms of deployment and extensibility. For example, it would be great if I could build an app package targeting the desktop, allow things like dynamic code generation via contracts, and then deploy it via OneGet.
|
|
|
|
|
Loving it!
|
|
|
|
|
Cool!
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Really like:
- DirectX interoperability
- Tooling Improvements
|
|
|
|