|
|
I read somewhere that they develop a new browser namend "Spartan" from the scratch. The concept is to compete with Chrome.
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Wow!! Seems interesting stuff..specially the name'Spartan'.
Thanks & Regards
Puneet Goel
Save Paper >> Save Tree >> Save Huminity
|
|
|
|
|
They may only be expecting 300 users worldwide
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
hahahah exactly
Thanks & Regards
Puneet Goel
Save Paper >> Save Tree >> Save Huminity
|
|
|
|
|
Some might say that the MS-offered browser has always been spartan.
I'd say that the name is a simple matter of calling a spade, "a spade".
spartan
adjective
showing or characterized by austerity or a lack of comfort or luxury.
"the accommodation was fairly spartan"
|
|
|
|
|
KarstenK wrote: I read somewhere that they develop a new browser namend "Spartan" from the scratch. The concept is to compete with Chrome.
Sounds more like they want to compete with "Trojan"
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Brent Jenkins wrote: Sounds more like they want to compete with "Trojan" In that case, I think they'd have to work a little harder on virus protection...
|
|
|
|
|
Hahaha let's bring the peace :P
Thanks & Regards
Puneet Goel
Save Paper >> Save Tree >> Save Huminity
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't have said it is from scratch, as it is still using the same engines.
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: still using the same engines
Agreed. THey are still using the Trident rendering engine and that's kind of the main portion of the browser.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No, they are not shut down internet explorer.
They just stop further development and to replace the same they try introduce Spartan[^].
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
It is not true. What is true is that Microsoft is building a new browser (as mentioned by others). That browser is consumer focused and contains features such as auto-update or Webstore like extensions. However, IE will still be part of Windows, especially for business customers. This is also due to backwards compatibility.
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, the first good news of 2015 eh?
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
The good news is that means there is another browser to support. w00t!
I'm sure the new MS browser will work entirely differently than IE. You know, like, "wait, does it support addEventListener or not?" MS couldn't make up their mind on that one. That's always fun. It only strengthens us developer types.
New Business Opportunity
Heck, it's so confusing now for consumers you could almost start a company which teaches people to click around in the browser, which should be the easiest thing in the world but isn't.
|
|
|
|
|
I am writing this article not as an opponent of F#, but rather, as someone who hopes that F# will become a mainstream .NET language. Because it's F#?
|
|
|
|
|
Don't expect specialized products to become wildly popular.
|
|
|
|
|
because F# is cool.. (not)
|
|
|
|
|
At first glance, I read that as:
"Why your F****** evangelism isn't working"
Guess the F# evangelism hasn't had the intended effect on me.
modified 7-Jan-15 12:56pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am seriously considering re-writing that web server code/article in F# just to see what it looks like.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: in F# just to see what it looks like
ANSWER
Ugly!
|
|
|
|
|
newton.saber wrote: Ugly!
Actually, what I've done in F# is really quite elegant. I think it all depends on who writes the code and how it's written.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: F# is really quite elegant
Prolly is. Sorry, I just couldn't resist. Functional languages just look so consarned ugly sometimes.
|
|
|
|