|
I, for one, welcome our new robotic overlords!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh, I see. A forward-thinking man with vision.
Bravo!
(could you put in a good word for me?)
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think you have what it takes to be an Excel Champion? If the answer is yes, then Microsoft has got the competition for you! #REF!
|
|
|
|
|
Comey’s comments came within the context of a larger discussion around the internet of things. He's tired of watching you working all the time
|
|
|
|
|
No wonder the Feebs botched the Clinton e-mail "investigation".
The tin foil hats kept slipping down over their eyes.
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. ~ Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
|
No mention of the associated microphone with the web cam. You can hear my evil, but not see it!
Hogan
|
|
|
|
|
The new version, rewritten with Microsoft's TypeScript, offers payload size and performance enhancements Because I know all of you have been impatiently waiting for this
|
|
|
|
|
Wait. What? Seriously. It just released!?! We were ramping up to using Angular (1.x) about 3 years ago when Google made the announcement about 2.x and that it would be a complete re-write. That's when we decided it didn't offer a strong benefit over ASP.NET / Razor and we'd be either writing on a dead API (1.x) or waiting around for the new API (2.x).
Plus, if you're already building your back-end via C# Visual Studio then you may as well take the whole stack from MS.
Google had a huge movement going with Angular then just let it slide away.
Here's a good article on the v1 versus v2 issue also:
Angular 2.0.0 Launched[^]
modified 15-Sep-16 15:40pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Had me excited for a minute, until I saw that it's the same ol bloated and obnoxious TypeScript beast that has been around for awhile now.
Directly coupling to a language subset is an unexpectedly huge mistake on Google's part.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
GitHub announced today at its developer conference the arrival of some long-awaited project-management features to its source-code-management platform. "Project management is one of those applications that everyone knows someone else should be using."
|
|
|
|
|
Researchers at NC State think that they have developed a new way to harvest body heat and turn it into electricity. "Well, I'm hot blooded, check it and see"
They *think* they have developed a new way. TO THE PRESS RELEASE MACHINE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another good excuse to get the guns out on a cool day.
"Lady, I'm not showing off just charging the pacemaker! "
|
|
|
|
|
And many told matrix' axiom of "we are just relegated to this [morpheus showing an battery]" was just way too fictive...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
How appropriate. I'm at my daughter's house. She's pregnant and keeps the temperature in the low 60s. There's no body heat left to harvest.
modified 15-Sep-16 12:43pm.
|
|
|
|
|
They haven't met my wife apparently.
|
|
|
|
|
The "powered by frigid" invention is next.
|
|
|
|
|
I looked at an invention at Texas A&M University, called a thermally Activated Capacitor. Basically, it uses a special dielectric between carbon fiber plates tto force charge migration to the plates in the presence of a thermal gradient.It didn't look too practical to me it delivered power on the order of nano watts. But perhaps someone figured a better way to do it. Interesting stuff.
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
Many businesses don't carry out frequent security testing despite believing that it's critically important to securing their systems and data, according to a new survey. For those who wonder why there are so many hacks lately
|
|
|
|
|
We know.We might be one of those who are vulnerable.
|
|
|
|
|
But it's so easy...
CEO: Do we have security vulnerabilities?
CTO: Yes.
Done.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm surpised it's not 3 or 4 out of five.
|
|
|
|
|
jeron1 wrote: I'm surpised it's not 3 or 4 out of five.
They test for it, but don't do anything about it. Of course, their testing often consists of the equivalent of:
"try 'password' for the password."
"That didn't work."
"We PASSED!"
(I wish this was a snarky answer.)
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Woodbury wrote: (I wish this was a snarky answer.) True.
Recently, I was asked to grant access to my sons school records by some third party company studying the effectiveness of the current teaching program at his school, they claimed "we take data protection seriously, therefore the risk is very low...", I, of course declined.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
The company has more than 16,419 contributors, beating Google and Facebook. "There is this thing called the GPL, which we disagree with. Nobody can ever improve the software."
Yeah, they don't use the GPL. Whatevs.
|
|
|
|