|
|
Unfortunately, with the debacle that is the Macbook Pro, I think I've bought my last Mac. I'd buy a Surface Studio in place of an iMac, and I'm hoping the Surface Pro 5 comes with enough battery life for me to hand off this cable-needy, peripheral-hating, driver-deficient piece of crap.
And I so loved my Macbook Air.
I even (and you may want to sit down for this) bought an old Galaxy S5 off eBay and I'm kind of impressed. The fingerprint reader is abysmal, and if Android (or Samsung's bloatware) would stop crashing that'd be awesome, but that phone is pretty nice.
It's like Apple hit a brick wall and no one even slowed down to check if they are all right.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
As you might guess, measuring antimatter is rather tricky: it's destroyed the moment it comes into contact with regular matter, so conventional approaches just aren't going to cut it. They used an anti-ruler
|
|
|
|
|
feh. Too easy.
Just use a ruler that goes from zero backwards.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Citizens who wanted to opt out of porn filter would have to pay $20 fee. Kid sister safe!
OK, it is politics. Please forgive me.
|
|
|
|
|
"his Human Trafficking Prevention Act would require manufacturers or sellers of computers or other devices that access the Internet to install digital blocks to prevent the viewing of obscene content."
Next he'll play God even more and decide for you exactly with IS and IS NOT obscene.
Censorship at its best.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
i.e. He needs to come up with a crap load of money!
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
I think it would be better if those who WANT the filter get to pay the fee.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: "Porn puts our children in harms way"
Why are the "righteous" people always so bad at grammar?
Slogans aren't solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
And why do parents have zero culpability in today's society? If you don't want the responsibility don't have the kid. Stop shitting on everyone else's parade because you're a terrible parent.
|
|
|
|
|
Because bypassing it would be hard, like uninstalling a program / substituting it's executable with a harmless one / formatting and putting on a cured operating system.
Politicians talk because... I never understood why, actually.
DURA LEX, SED LEX
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
The Facebook exec's creation illustrates the promises and piftalls of virtual assistants. Because I know you want to get working on your own
|
|
|
|
|
Can Zuck actually code? Is it for real that we're supposed to believe that he developed some AI on his own? For realz?
I thought maybe he knew PHP or something and maybe nothing beyond that?
Was his background really in development? Just curious.
|
|
|
|
|
Fake news.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to dramatically increase your programming skills you need to be reading other people’s code. Copy and paste faster?
|
|
|
|
|
A great majority of the code I've cut and pasted in the past has been buggy and therefore has increased my debugging skills and in a round about way has increased my programming skills but only because I had to know it to debug it.
I guess they're talking about reading code of people that actually know how to code?
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: I guess they're talking about reading code of people that actually know how to code?
Oh, where's the fun in that?
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
touche'
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to find the best goalkeeper look for the worst defence..
|
|
|
|
|
Popularity may not be a single vector answer, but students and professionals still want to know if they're guiding their careers and companies in the right direction. "Art thou base, common and popular?"
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't articles like this be titled, "Languages for which you need Google"?
In my experience, C# is way more used than Java, but the local help is quite good and for anything more, you go directly to Microsoft.com.
|
|
|
|
|
Being comfortable in multiple languages and frameworks is important, because the computer industry is changing so much.
Does no one question this hysteria of the language/framework du jour and this constant (actually, accelerating) rapid change?
Does no one consider that what this creates is a bunch of mediocre developers, not because developers are mediocre, but because no one has the time to become highly skilled at a particular language or framework?
Does no one consider the actual cost of having to maintain and fix problems in a complex system, not because the system itself has complex business logic, but because the system requires knowledge in SQL, NoSQL, ORM-of-the-day, IoC-of-the-day, Java/C#/Python/Php/Ruby/Go/R/F#/Scala/Haskell/..., Javascript/HTML/CSS/jQuery, Backbone/Angular/Boostrap/Knockout...
Does no one consider that all this kitchen sink of languages requires an equal porridge/cesspool of tools - compilers, editors, test frameworks, debuggers, loggers, containers, installers, deployers, bug trackers...
Does no one consider that the result becomes a process control nightmare to manage all this?
No, I don't think so. Where wise men perhaps would tread cautiously, fools cavort instead.
Of course it's still a playground, and it's a fun playground, and the link in my sig certainly betrays that I too quite enjoy the foolish cavorting, but perhaps the difference is that I also know the difference between wisdom and foolery.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Where wise men perhaps would tread cautiously, fools cavort instead good quote
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
NIF turns its lasers down to five, gets the similar amount of fusion. With added menthol
|
|
|
|