|
It could also be used to determine one's level of constipation.
|
|
|
|
|
Swift 4 builds on the strengths of Swift 3, delivering greater robustness and stability, providing source code compatibility with Swift 3, making improvements to the standard library, and adding features like archival and serialization. Now even swifter!
|
|
|
|
|
That was fast, I mean swift!!! Already on version 4 and the initial version was release just a short while ago...
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
TheGreatAndPowerfulOz wrote: the initial version was release just a short while ago... September 2014 actually and there has been a new version every September since. It's almost like they plan this stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
Already knew that. Ever heard of snark?
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
JNBridge is soliciting developers to try out its upcoming Java.VS extension, which enables Java programming within Microsoft's flagship IDE. Because it's not Eclipse
|
|
|
|
|
‘I’m definitely not worried about the AI apocalypse,’ says Google’s John Giannandrea At least, that's what the AI told him to say
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is taking the next steps in its "One Windows" vision with an internal project called "Andromeda OS" that turns Windows 10 into a modular platform and lays foundations for the future of Windows. Not to be confused with the galaxy, the starship, or the Google code name
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't they try this before with windows xp embedded?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Wasn't that just letting you not install things like calculator or windows media player on top of the normal image customization that they let IT depts do? Basically just a lot more control of user facing bits vs ripping out big chunks of what was build as a monolithic OS.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
IIRC, the customization level was greater - you could add/remove various subsystems - video, network, etc. You also built a system containing only the drivers needed - no detection of new hardware.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Or the sh*tt* game by EA.
They botched waht would have been an ultimate success in a great saga.
* CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
* GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
* Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game.
* I'm a puny punmaker.
|
|
|
|
|
The online education company is also expanding its self-driving car programming, with an Intro to Self-Driving Cars program without any application restrictions. "Meet George Jetson..."
|
|
|
|
|
nanodegree I imagine you would need a really small frame to display that.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Both Flow and TypeScript are pretty good, and conservatively either of them can prevent about 15% of the bugs that end up in committed code. This is my shocked face
|
|
|
|
|
Upgrades should require 'little or no refactoring' for most projects, but there are some breaking changes. Just in case this is your cup of pre-JavaScript
And TypeScript isn't your type, and Dart misses the mark. OK, I'll get my coat now.
|
|
|
|
|
D-Wave's quantum annealers face a fundamental limitation when it comes to scaling: temperature. Add more quanta? Wiggle the knob?
|
|
|
|
|
More money?
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Flip the switch from "magic" to "more magic"?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Change the 10 on the scale to an 11.
|
|
|
|
|
Current programmers should adopt several attitudes that early mainframe developers considered an essential part of their skillsets. Don't shuffle the cards before submitting?
Learned that one the hard way.
|
|
|
|
|
It’s not about refactoring: Optimize up front
Finally, someone with some common sense.
|
|
|
|
|
Write bug free code
Now why did I never think of that!
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
Oh those are really great ideas!
I like to provide users with a non-usable command-line interface.
And maintenance programmers with code highly optimized for non-readability.
Oh sanctissimi Wilhelmus, Theodorus, et Fredericus!
|
|
|
|
|
Modern software development costs are a fraction of what they cost back in the 70s so isn't relevant to today. I'm sure there's not a single developer who is aware of the costs they incur doing their jobs.
With today's modern compilers, unit testing frameworks, testing tools etc it is getting easier to write more robust code with fewer defects. I don't think there's a single developer who consciously sits down and thinks "I really must add some more bugs to my code". Surely this just goes without saying.
However, I think optimising up front is a good thing. By aiming for efficient code, you need to design for it, as oposed to just writing code from day one that sucks and refactoring later (if you ever get the chance to go back that is).
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|