|
The research team has developed a novel device called a "memtransistor," which operates much like a neuron by performing both memory and information processing. With combined characteristics of a memristor and transistor, the memtransistor also encompasses multiple terminals that operate more similarly to a neural network. Maybe someone will soon have a bright idea, and we can get mem-LEDs
modified 23-Feb-18 1:03am.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Chipmaker's latest microcode addresses stability issues faced by previous patches on 7th and 8th gen hardware belongs to the thread below, methinks. Link seems OK, though.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
If they're going to mimic the human brain they still need to work out the BSOD phenomenon otherwise know as stupidity.
Don't let your mind wander too far.
It's too small to be let out alone.
|
|
|
|
|
brain-like computing...
So computers are going to start forgetting where they left their keys?
|
|
|
|
|
Chipmaker's latest microcode addresses stability issues faced by previous patches on 7th and 8th gen hardware At least until someone tries it
|
|
|
|
|
Alexa-controlled toilets are a thing in 2018, but cost thousands. An enterprising person can make their own by following these instructions. It takes a bit of work, multiple components and about $750 (plus the cost of the toilet), but the end result is a voice-controlled toilet — and everyone needs that in their life. For your programming library
|
|
|
|
|
My wife said if I spend that kind of coin just to make a voice controlled toilet and it doesn't work...Urine trouble mister!
|
|
|
|
|
Now if it can raise or lower the seat automatically based on the person approaching, that would be worth while...
|
|
|
|
|
Can the toilet play doom yet?
|
|
|
|
|
In the ideal world, software developers would analyze each problem in the language of its domain and then articulate solutions in matching terms. They could thus easily communicate with domain experts and separate problem-specific ideas from the details of general-purpose languages and specific program design decisions. You compile it with a compiler compiler?
|
|
|
|
|
Weird one. The article cites lofty goals about breaking down the barriers between languages and libraries and so forth and then shows examples of what looks like a pretty generic functional language being used in a pretty generic kind of way. Unless I'm missing something huge, of course.
Why on Earth do they want to call it "Racket", I wonder?
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
His discovery helps us validate models of what's going on inside these explosions. "Timing is everything"
|
|
|
|
|
At IBM's Index developer conference in San Francisco, on Tuesday, The Register sat down with Big Blue's Java CTO John Duimovich to talk about the Java programming language, IBM, the cloud and other developer-oriented concerns. Instead, they should create a web-manifest file, compile their jar, sign the jar, make sure the appropriate JRE is installed...
...and a few more steps I'm sure I've blissfully forgotten.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: "The notion that as a developer you'll have to learn Docker, Kubernetes, and 30 other things before you can even deploy an app is something I'd like to get rid of," he said.
Should have added, "Therefore, I suggest you adopt .NET."
|
|
|
|
|
Accenture is out with a new developer ecosystem study investigating what's important to developers and how they access resources Because if anyone knows "developer friendly", it's a huge consulting firm with a vested interest in complexity
|
|
|
|
|
Security researchers at Appsecure found a way to access anyone's Tinder account via their phone number. No one knows my phone number, right? Uh, asking for a friend.
|
|
|
|
|
Remember: forewarned is forearmed " In time you will come to regard me not only with respect and awe, but with love."
Hmm. Mini-theme today.
|
|
|
|
|
I find one sentence in the article to be really true
Article says: In other words: a little more conversation and a little more action please.
But not only in AI topic, i.e. genetic experiments and other "revolutionary" technologies.
I am not against the progress, but I am afraid that something will explode in our nose.
I don't know whose quote is but...
Someone wrote (aprox): My biggest fear is that humanity is increasing knowledge at the cost or reducing wisdom
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The initiative joins Hot Wheels and Monster High lessons to bring coding to 10 million kids by 2020. "Math class is tough"
|
|
|
|
|
I can see the code now.
string g = string.Empty;
If that was for the Ken doll then I guess it would be for the "eunuchs" operating system.
|
|
|
|
|
Most people aren't capable of writing anything more the trivial code. I believe that percentage is even higher for kids. Yes, you have child prodigies in every field, but they are the exception which proves the rule.
I also wonder if this is even good for kids' brain development. (We have a very weird society which extends childhood and accelerates it at the same time.)
PS. Another problem is that effective coding first requires development of logical thinking, independent of "code logic". I think it far more effective teaching kids general problem solving before heading down the narrower discipline of coding.
modified 21-Feb-18 19:21pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Woodbury wrote: PS. Another problem is that effective coding first requires development of logical thinking, independent of "code logic". I think it far more effective teaching kids general problem solving before heading down the narrower discipline of coding. Totally agree with you.
The problem is... there is a big % of population who lack of any kind of logic.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The flaw in question relates to the SvcMoveFileInheritSecurity remote procedure call (RPC), which if exploited, can lead to an arbitrary file being assigned an arbitrary security descriptor, that can potentially lead to elevation of privilege. Not a dupe - honest
|
|
|
|
|
first read that as "not a dope", hmmm, maybe not a Freudian reading...
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|