|
Given the idiocy I've seen surrounding bank cyber security, I'd say it's closer to 100%.
- Things like passwords can't be more than x (where x is a single digit) characters.
- Requiring you zip and password protect the zip file before you upload it - sounds to me like they're using a non-secure upload back end (FTP over SSH comes to mind).
- Requiring you install their software to use their services - this is very common in the business side of the bank.
- etc.
|
|
|
|
|
The strength of the software development team is each individual developer. The strength of each developer is the team. How else are managers going to figure out how many whips to buy next year?
If recent history is any guide, the CEO knows everything about the platform. So, they can judge how worthwhile each dev automagically.
|
|
|
|
|
I have yet to see any way to measure this quantitatively, let alone qualitatively. Maybe it could be done by giving two developers the same assignment, but who's going to fund that? And if you chose a different assignment, the outcome could be rather different.
Most of my career was spent designing and developing in-house application frameworks that improved other people's productivity. How much of the increase (or decrease ) in their productivity would then be imputed to me?
The article suggests measuring team performance. I don't see how that's any easier. It says that individual developers are only as strong as their teams, which in my experience is a false platitude.
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder why I never see articles about measuring manager productivity.
I guess because the answer is, what's there to measure?
|
|
|
|
|
Managers are supporting roles. A good manager does not produce, improves the productivity of their underlings. Facing the various customers / agencies / validators, managing licenses and supplies, setting tasks' priority under his own responsibility.
I had very few good managers but they do exist.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
The dilapidated Birkenstocks were worn by Steve Jobs during the early days of Apple and were initially expected to fetch $60,000 to $80,000. *Foot spray available separately
|
|
|
|
|
That's a steal!
|
|
|
|
|
Can't wait to see the going rate for a new ISandal...
|
|
|
|
|
You can find GitHub Codespaces in 50+ LinkedIn Learning tech courses to get real-world software development environments for today’s six most popular programming languages, as well as key topics like data science, AI, and machine learning. Again surprising me that LinkedIn is for something other than telling your coworkers that you're looking for a new job
|
|
|
|
|
This keyword forces the caller to initialize the required field and property in the object initializer scope. Required reading (for some)
|
|
|
|
|
A Bank for International Settlements working paper also notes that people dive into crypto not because of decentralized ideals, but because of rising prices. Today in news you already knows
|
|
|
|
|
They must not have had three friends...
|
|
|
|
|
Much the same is true in the stock market. People tend to buy when everyone is excited during a bull market, but panic out during major corrections. The average retail investor significantly underperforms the market, though I don't think the majority actually lose money.
|
|
|
|
|
The settlement outlines that Google misled its users into thinking they had turned off location tracking even as the company continued to collect their location information. Not evil, just nosy?
“For years Google has prioritized profit over their users’ privacy” <-- isn't that the new corporate slogan?
|
|
|
|
|
So...
They have won a couple of Billions with it over that time. This fine is really going to make them stop doing it. Yeah, right!
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Not really, now it's plain that it's unlawful and any repeated behavior is penally relevant.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Will big bro stop watching us? I do not believe
|
|
|
|
|
For more than half a century, researchers around the world have been struggling with an algorithmic problem known as "the single source shortest path problem." How short is a path?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: How short is a path? Singularly?
|
|
|
|
|
4 letters?
If they accept "way" with three letters, we would already have an even shortest path
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This allows you to work with a solution that spans more than one repository, enabling git operations across several repositories at the same time. Repositoryception!
|
|
|
|
|
This will be a big selling point to independent developers who contract with different companies.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd really hope that contractors aren't mixing projects from different clients in the same solution.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
True, but previously I had been unable to use different repositories for different solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
Hiring more people is a solution, not a problem. By restating the problem as one of morale and stress, we open the door to many possible solutions. Just don't take the splitting too far
Management advice from Solomon
|
|
|
|