|
In all seriousness I just don't see any demand for FoxPro resources. If a bunch of developers start asking, or start posting FoxPro articles or questions then I'd certainly think about it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
OK I understand. Anyway thanks for the reply.
T. Swaney
www.pcknowledgevault.com
|
|
|
|
|
It occurs to me that we need a bug icon for the articles when posting a message. This way, users can see whether the message is a bug or not.
"If only one person knows the truth, it is still the truth." - Mahatma Gandhi Web - Blog - RSS - Math
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: It occurs to me that we need a bug icon for the articles when posting a message. This way, users can see whether the message is a bug or not.
I like the idea. Although, given that even most of the regulars don't change the message icon for their posts, I doubt many posters would use it.
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Michael P Butler wrote: I doubt many posters would use it.
Or abuse it.
"If only one person knows the truth, it is still the truth." - Mahatma Gandhi Web - Blog - RSS - Math
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
does anybody have an idea why I the 'Bookmark This' command on the CodeProject web page may have disappeared...
HOW CAN I GET IT BACK
Lothar
|
|
|
|
|
Have another look at an article. You should see it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know why you had to go and hide it, Chris...
|
|
|
|
|
It would be cool if when linking articles from CP using the link and link[^] buttons that it would automatically fill in the description text from said article (
for example, I was linking Chris Maunder's Grid Control article in the C++ forum, and I pasted the link, and pressed the link[^] button.
for example
(replace this text with a description in the article[^]
instead of just showing the link address.
Maximilien Lincourt
Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
|
|
|
|
|
It would be good if I could specify that I only want to search for C# programs in my profile instead of having to uncheck the other four checkboxes each time I perform a search.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
where have gone the competition[^] articles ?
i can only see the prizes and the previous winners...
am i missing a link ?
(please tell me the way to wind it myself - not only provide the correct link, if any).
thanks.
TOXCCT >>> GEII power [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VCalc 3.0 soon...]
|
|
|
|
|
This library is available as open source for Windows/Linux and many other platforms. A patch for the opensource version to use it with Visual C++ 6.0/2003/2005 is available on the internet. So it would be great to a have a message board here on code project to share source code.
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of times over the past month or two I've had replies to but didn't receive any email notification for. Most replies I do receive a notification for, but I have no idea what happens to these select few - perhaps they walk along a dangerous road and get kidnapped?
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the Messages Posted link, it would be nice to see a Messages Voted link, so that I can come back to an article that I've read that I know I voted for. Me, me, me. It's always about me.
"If only one person knows the truth, it is still the truth." - Mahatma Gandhi Web - Blog - RSS - Math
|
|
|
|
|
CodeProject,
Please consider adding code categories and forums for Database(stored proc...), Java, and maybe even PHP... I know CodeProject's primary focus is on Windows/.NET but our large group of developers probably has a lot to say about other technologies.
|
|
|
|
|
hnmedcom wrote: Please consider adding code categories and forums for Database(stored proc...),
The SQL / ADO / ADO.NET[^] covers all database topics.
hnmedcom wrote: Java, and maybe even PHP...
As with all things, if lots of articles get posted on the subject then I'm sure the CP team will be happy to create new categories to cover the subjects. The Web Development and General Discussion forums should probably be used to PHP and Java questions, if a lot of questions and answers are posted then again I'm sure new forums will be created.
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
uhhm. I'm confused. Why do we have a Java forum and no link to it from the Forums home page?
CP is a great platform I bet Java, PHP... developers would love to contribute more around here.
|
|
|
|
|
hnmedcom wrote: uhhm. I'm confused. Why do we have a Java forum and no link to it from the Forums home page?
because it is a legacy forum. I'm surprised it is still even around. It hardly ever got used, so it was removed to allow space for more popular discussion topics.
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
> [Michael wrote:] It hardly ever got used
There are plenty of Java/PHP developers out there. Java... forum "hardly ever got used" because we are too focused on MS-oriented techs to attract those devs. Anyway, that is CP's decision.
|
|
|
|
|
Now there more and more informtion and examples are poping up about AJAX I think it would be a good idea to create a place where we can post questions, examples...ect
When can we expect an AJAX forum?
Will
I hate users. Not all of them, just the ones who talk.CP member: Al Einstien
-- modified at 18:27 Friday 10th February, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol...
I hate users. Not all of them, just the ones who talk.CP member: Al Einstien
|
|
|
|
|
I have just found the following typo in the article submission guidelines:
"The idea is to give the reader a clear of idea of the purpose of your code..."
There's one "of" too much.
Regards, Mario
|
|
|
|
|
Guys, I think that you should update the current article submission process. I understand that you have it the way it is to ensure quality control, but surely you could have this all happen online in the wizard without having to zip up and email changes to previously published articles. Frankly, it's a pain in the butt and when I get the momentary urge to make an update, then I think to myself about having to do the whole zipping up and emailing thing and I think... ahh can't be bothered right now.
Let's look at the facts. People these days are motivated by convenience. If you make this a convenient and super-quick process, you'll find people making updates much more often. You don't have to publish the changes straight away, just make it quick to log in, find your article, make some changes and submit the changes for approval. Upon approval, the article would be re-published. The current process is inconvenient. Sure, you can come back with "well don't be lazy" or something to that effect, but let's be realistic. If you improve the whole article submission/approval process for published articles, you're going to get a lot more people bothering to actually keep their articles up to date.
Easier process = more authors making updates. As a result, The Code Project's average quality of articles will increase. Help us busy people make spur-of-the-moment updates when it's on our mind and we have 5 minutes to blow without forcing us to stuff around just to make a minor update.
NATHAN RIDLEY
Web Application Developer
email: snowdevil [@] gmail.com
web/blog: www.ersysgroup.com[^]
|
|
|
|