|
brahmma wrote: But I would suggest that apart from the author, CodeProject MVPs and/or SysAdmin, editors and staff must be allowed to moderate the questions posted.
Yes that will be good. Author won't be available all the time.. Nice suggestion
|
|
|
|
|
no. Because authors of crap articles will simply moderate all the just criticism they receive away to make their resume fodder look better.
--
If you view money as inherently evil, I view it as my duty to assist in making you more virtuous.
|
|
|
|
|
Precisely
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree.
If you put a note in a big red font saying 'DO NOT DELETE POSTS WHICH SLAUGHTER YOUR CRAP ARTICLE' somewhere on the authors forum, then they won't delete them. This method has certainly working in preventing programming posts being left in the lounge
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|
|
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The comment moderation should be a fine blend of Author View + a Panel of CodeProject Admins. In that way, the autocracy of the Author and consequent hypocrisy is offset. We thus, gain to maintain a healthy mix of suggestions and criticisms on the article without any offensive content.
|
|
|
|
|
Awww - I didn't think my article on posting guidelines was that bad. Oh well.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
lol.
I went to clean up your article but some of the replies to the comments were too good to remove
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: some of the replies to the comments were too good to remove
There is a rich vein of humour on this site. It's part of the reason I keep coming back.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: There is a rich vein of humour on this site. It's part of the reason I keep coming back.
You mean you go away often??
|
|
|
|
|
ChandraRam wrote: You mean you go away often??
Well - toilet breaks, sleeping and bathing.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
N a v a n e e t h wrote: See this[^], author wrote a good article on how to post questions, and so many members has posted their programming questions on the article discussion board!
Irony is a wonderful thing. I love it!
|
|
|
|
|
I see four emotions are same, tooltips of these are "Insert a smile", "Insert laugh", "Insert a wink", "stick out your tongue", can anyone tell why single emotion has been assigned for these four, further more check that all tooltips prefixed with word insert except "stick out your tongue".
Also shouldn't it look better if the word "insert" being removed from the tooltips of emotions? IMO "Add a smiley" is sufficient.
Best Regards,
Mushq
Mushtaque Ahmed Nizamani
Software Engineer
Ultimus Pakistan
|
|
|
|
|
Mushq wrote: I see four emotions are same,
Each emoticon looks different on my computer!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am attaching the screent shot.
http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/7567/codeprojectemotioniconsrp7.jpg[^]
Mark Salsbery wrote: These all look the same?
Yes These.
Mark Salsbery wrote: It's time to make the move from DOS to Windows
I am using
OS:
Microsoft Windows Server 2003
Standard Edition
Service Pack 2
IE:
Internet Explorer 7.0
Best Regards,
Mushq
Mushtaque Ahmed Nizamani
Software Engineer
Ultimus Pakistan
|
|
|
|
|
Some of those are animated images. They start out looking the same, but then change. Specifically, are all animated.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Salsbery wrote: These all look the same?
My guess is that he's not seeing the animation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
While I was making up some Moo cards[^] this weekend, I ran into the problem that the URL to my list of articles is too long to print on a card. I would love to have something shorter like http://www.codeproject.com/author/152 which would redirect to http://www.codeproject.com/script/articles/list_articles.asp?userid=152. The benefit being that the former is easier to remember and looks better on resumes, cards, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
I second this idea, perhaps with the ability to change the default (which would be the userid) to something user specified, like a user name.
Optionally, provide the same mechanism to simply point to the profile page.
|
|
|
|
|
I think this suggestion should be simple when the website is moving to .NET. Chris and Co. are working on a new version of the website, as they tell every now and then. Isn't it?
In ASP.NET URLRewriting is pretty simpler. With the classic ASP version, this might involve costly ISAPI DLLs and more number of server hiccups like 'ASP Engine Cried ', considering the acute load on the server.
Let us wait and see if someone from Chris Team can advise whether member homepages is part of thier TodoList for the new version.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it probably would be simple to set this up on the new version...and yes, it is actively being worked on but not many new features have been added yet.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a good suggestion. But for this immediate purpose of making up a card, can't you use tinyurl?
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->ßRÅhmmÃ<-·´¯`·.
|
|
|
|