|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: I don't have the add now
add == advertisement?
To quote the old fly-in-the-soup joke: Keep your voice down or everyone will want one.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: add == advertisement?
Yes
Chris Maunder wrote: To quote the old fly-in-the-soup joke: Keep your voice down or everyone will want one.
Never heard that one before but did make me
But like I said I can't constantly reproduce it and doesn't seem to be all that often, so might not be worth the effort to track it down.
|
|
|
|
|
A month ago Chris fixed a bug rare enough that it took several months before we accurately identified the series of events that caused it. It would result in the last message that should've been returned in a forum view not being shown.
The latest nation. Procrastination.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a caching and threading issue that I'm reworking at the moment. As Dan said - these things can be awfully hard to reproduce on the live site, let alone in development.
However, I've gone back to first principles on parts of the code in the hope that using monosyllabic words will make the compiler finally understand me.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
This code highlighting really bugs me; the default language should be text, or perhaps it should be a per user setting.
|
|
|
|
|
Why would you include plain text in a code block? Use <TT> if you want a fixed-width inline region.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Does <TT> have a button to insert automatically in the editor?
Also, the code tag is (ab)used to make inline edits of quoted text.
The latest nation. Procrastination.
|
|
|
|
|
Even when I post code that I don't want highlit?
|
|
|
|
|
I have made the assumption that the chances that a CODE block will have code that the user doesn't want highlighted is less than the chance that it contains code they do want it highlighted and so ended up with the decision that if you don't want a CODE block highlighted then the <code lang="text"> option, while inconvenient for you, is more convenient for the majority of users.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I just tried it with a Regex; bleah, it's just black, I like the red of a code block.
|
|
|
|
|
Love the yellow sticky, your determination to get these idiots to read the rules is admirable - have you considered using blinking fuchsia. JSOP may venture out of the WPF and Lounge for that.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Are authors able to vote for there own articles or is someone messing about?
Some awful unpublished articles have one 5 vote.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, anyone can vote for their own article - I would one vote all mine but I can't do it anonymously so I'd know it was me
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn) Visual Basic is not used by normal people so we're not covering it here. (Uncyclopedia) Why are you using VB6? Do you hate yourself? (Christian Graus)
|
|
|
|
|
I assume it's Indians people voting for their countrymen.
|
|
|
|
|
Further to VectorX's post, please take a look at this[^] thread from the lounge. It seems that someone has accidentally approved one of the offending, I hesitate to call them articles, for publication.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Minute wrote: I hesitate to call them articles
would-be articles? concoctions? crud spittle?[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I am recireving many autogenerated mails of reply notification of Questions in Mentor Group.Although I have not joined it.The subject tag "Re: Author #15" and many more.Please look into it.
Cheers!!
Brij
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for letting us know Brij, we've fixed it
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like there are major issues with these new articles needing approval. Plus the author profiles are wacked too. It says they have been members since 9 years 1 month.
at[^]
w4[^]
w3[^]
w2[^]
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/Christian-S-Andersen[^]
Please look at all there profiles and see, many of them have weird info.
"I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." Einstein
"Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example." Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
It's the spammer blindly adding co-authors with low id-numbers. If you look at the authors, the 2nd id is very recently created.
|
|
|
|
|
As the Backroom does not have voting privileges, should a thread as moved to the Backroom, irrespective where from, that have any postings as marked "Message Automatically Removed" be revoked and the original message returned. Without voting any post marked "Message Automatically Removed" looks strange and out-of-place.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Almost by definition do posts in the Backroom look strange and out of place.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
"Articles Submitted" on a who is who page is no longer a link on web13 (it hovers to underline, but it remains black and the cursor is an ibeam, not a finger). web15 is fine. both repeatedly.
|
|
|
|