|
Even more importantly, he knows better than to try to spell when he's had a few.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
What do you mean by a few?
Mind you, I'm only asking for DD's benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
I love you man!
Can't see how to get to third.
Platinum count and organiser!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: yes, people can get negative rep, it has been seen many times.
I did not know that. Then the definition makes sense.
That also means that 1+5 != 2*3 for equal weights.
|
|
|
|
|
1+5 and 3+3 are the same for the average score (assuming equal weight), and not the same for reputation (weight irrelevant here).
|
|
|
|
|
Up to a point though. Once too many people have voted, the max daily will be reached if you have a thousand threes or a couple of fives.
|
|
|
|
|
THIS[^] guy is asking silly questions in every forum at the interval of some time and trying to flood the forum with his question.
I made him understand many times that what could be proper way of asking. But He's just going on with ignoring all the comments.
|
|
|
|
|
Just ignore his question, he will soon get the message.
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
|
|
|
|
|
Hiren Solanki wrote: I made him understand many times that what could be proper way of asking. But He's just going on with ignoring all the comments.
There's kind of a contradiction for you.
|
|
|
|
|
In the menus this forum is known as Buzzword Bingo[^] but on the actual page it is titled Buzzword Hall of Shame.
The Whiteboard - Surely the most remarkable invention ever?
|
|
|
|
|
Oh Come on Don't ask for this silly problem.
Addition from my side.
The Lounge written in the menus and Welcome to the Lounge! on the actual page.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll get that fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
In all your date search pages (i.e., Lounge, News, etc.), the date picker is slightly above the date field to the left of it. That just looks wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
yep.
and while you're at it, the default of "in posts" is unfortunate, the defaults in a filter form should be give me everything, hence "in posts and replies".
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that's an easy fix. Move Posts & Replies to the top instead of at the bottom as it is.
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: that's an easy fix
[chuckle]...
How often have I had user's tell me that about applications I've supported...
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, relatively easy I should say. Besides, CP users aren't your average user.
|
|
|
|
|
And that probably annoys the h*** out of Chris and his minions...
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Only if we tell him how to fix it. Otherwise, this page would not exist.
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed, final testing on other stuff before I upload.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
next to new or recently update thread links. It is happening to me at work and at home.
Windows XP SP2 w/ IE 7
|
|
|
|
|
works for me, even in IE7. Try some CTRL/F5 or a real/nother browser.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: works for me, even in IE7.
It is working for me now. For some reason it wasn't working at home or at work...now it is.
I like IE 7. Also, where I work, Internet Explorer is the only authorized browser; so I really don't have a choice in the matter.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: Also, where I work, Internet Explorer is the only authorized browser; so I really don't have a choice in the matter.
Same here. Lucky for me portable apps has every workaround I need.
|
|
|
|
|