|
|
Thank you for help...I am able to draw image.
I need your help in one more problem as described below:
I need to draw image on the screen using XOR so that diff of 2 images can be draw as a complete image. How to solve this?
|
|
|
|
|
first you can get the path,then set ID and path link！
so，your first method can do it
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I want 3 split windows in my application,in that left for Tree control and Right window act as a main window and bottom window have list control to show some log of my application. For that i made this code..
in Mainframe.cpp(), in OnCreateClient()
if(!m_SplitterWnd.CreateStatic(this, 2, 1))
return FALSE;
CRect rect;
GetClientRect(&rect);
if(!m_SplitterWnd.CreateView(1, 0, RUNTIME_CLASS(CBottomView), CSize(rect.Width(), 50), pContext))
return FALSE;
m_SplitterWnd.SetRowInfo(0, 800, 50);
m_SplitterWnd.SetRowInfo(1, 330, 50);
if (!m_SplitterWnd1.CreateStatic(&m_SplitterWnd, 1, 2, WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_BORDER |AFX_IDW_PANE_FIRST, m_SplitterWnd.IdFromRowCol(0,0)))
return FALSE;
if(!m_SplitterWnd1.CreateView(0, 0, RUNTIME_CLASS(CTreeMenuView), CSize(rect.Width()/5,rect.Height()-50), pContext))
return FALSE;
if(!m_SplitterWnd1.CreateView(0, 1, RUNTIME_CLASS(CMainWindowView), CSize(rect.Width()-rect.Width()/5,rect.Height()-50), pContext))
return FALSE;
int nWidth=rect.Width();
m_SplitterWnd1.SetColumnInfo(0, nWidth*0.25, 50);
m_SplitterWnd1.SetColumnInfo(1, nWidth*0.75, 50);
return CMDIFrameWnd::OnCreateClient(lpcs, pContext);
And i have to attach all my child window in right side window( CMainWindowView)..
In my app class,
pDocTemplate = new CMultiDocTemplate(IDR_MAINFRAME,
RUNTIME_CLASS(CABBHarmonyDoc),
RUNTIME_CLASS(CChildFrame),
RUNTIME_CLASS(CMainWindowView));
if (!pDocTemplate)
return FALSE;
AddDocTemplate(pDocTemplate);
pGraphViewTemplate = new CMultiDocTemplate(
IDR_MAINFRAME,
RUNTIME_CLASS(CABBHarmonyDoc),
RUNTIME_CLASS(CChildFrame),
RUNTIME_CLASS(CGraphview));
AddDocTemplate(pGraphViewTemplate);
So when i press F5,this GraphView should display in MainwindowView.
But it does not appear.Whats the mistake i did? Pls help me..
in Mianframe.cpp
void CMainFrame::OnGraphview()
{
if( pGraphDisplayFrame == NULL )
{
CDocTemplate *pTemplate = theApp.pGraphViewTemplate;
CABBHarmonyDoc* pDoc = new CABBHarmonyDoc;
pGraphDisplayFrame = (CMDIChildWnd *)pTemplate->CreateNewFrame( pDoc ,NULL );
if( pGraphDisplayFrame == NULL )
{
AfxMessageBox( "Unable to Create Graph Display" );
return;
}
pTemplate->InitialUpdateFrame( pGraphDisplayFrame,NULL );
}
else
MDIActivate( pGraphDisplayFrame );
}
When i debug, i found in winfrm.cpp,
void CFrameWnd::InitialUpdateFrame(CDocument* pDoc, BOOL bMakeVisible)
{
CView* pView = NULL;
if (GetActiveView() == NULL)
{
CWnd* pWnd = GetDescendantWindow(AFX_IDW_PANE_FIRST, TRUE); if (pWnd != NULL && pWnd->IsKindOf(RUNTIME_CLASS(CView)))
{
pView = (CView*)pWnd;
SetActiveView(pView, FALSE);
}
}
Here pWnd returns NULL. Whats the mistake pls help me out.
Anu
|
|
|
|
|
You are allocating a new uninitialized instance of your document in OnGraphView() and use it for creation of the new frame. You should replace the pDoc parameter by your existing document.
You may also move the OnGraphView() handler from the main frame class to your document class (passing then this for the document pointer). Because the graph can be only shown when a document has been loaded.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a bit of strange behavior with a MFC application that I haven't seen before.
The application is a simple MFC Dialog running unders Windows XP SP3 and using Visual Studio 2008. It builds fine under Debug and Release configurations. The Debug executable runs fine under the debugger and also within Visual Studio using the Start Without Debugging button. The Release executable runs fine directly from Windows.
However, the Debug executable does NOT run fine directly from Windows. When double clicked from Windows Explorer, there is a brief hourglass and then what appears to be a quick exit. No messages, no nothing. Adding a few AfxMessageBox calls to the app's CWinAppEx class, it appears that not only does the app's InitInstance method not get called, but even the CWinAppEx constructor does not get called. Obviously, this makes debugging the problem somewhat difficult.
Anyone seen similar behavior before? Seems like it might be a manifest problem of some sort, but I don't see why it would only affect the Debug executable and only directly from Windows.
Additional Info: With a little more testing, I found that this behavior occurs even in a simple test application as soon as I add any code that requires an internally developed DLL. Note that if I rename this DLL, I get the usual can't find the DLL message. So the app is finding the DLL, but for some reason, in Debug configuration, there's a problem only when running directly from Windows.
modified 8-May-12 14:47pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Does the "internally developed DLL" have any resources that are being used by the EXE or is it just exported functions that are being used?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Show me a community that obeys the Ten Commandments and I'll show you a less crowded prison system." - Anonymous
modified 9-May-12 9:17am.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have the sources/project for this "internally developped DLL"? If yes, try the following: load the project for the DLL, build it and hit F5, VS should ask you to specify the executable you want to test your DLL with (if it doesn't, you can specify that somewhere in the project settings, can't recall where now), browse for your exe, select it and let it run (make it so it will load the DLL you just built, like, placing the executable right next to the DLL) and see if there are any exceptions thrown, check the debugger's output window too for any hints, maybe you will see something useful.
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. <
> If it doesn't matter, it's antimatter.<
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Experts,
I need to transfer image via Socket, somtimes image may be same or may somewhat similar.
I am trying to get diffrenece of images so that I can be sent faster via socket.
Image type is jpeg...Please suggest how to send min data of image?
|
|
|
|
|
john5632 wrote: I am trying to get diffrenece of images so that I can be sent faster via socket.
This may not be totally helpful, but it may help direct you.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Show me a community that obeys the Ten Commandments and I'll show you a less crowded prison system." - Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
hello Friends
I come across to this situation first time and googled a lot but no Luck.
I am adding two multipleDocTemplates except their Document class is Different.
Now,I am opening a File using one Document template but I want to save that File using another Document template.
Where and how will i switch to another Doc Template so that when I save it uses another Doc template.
An Ideas??
Regards
Yogesh
|
|
|
|
|
I need some help with the jump physics example I found on the web.
The following code makes my character go up and down, but I have to press and hold down the arrow-up key on my keyboard.
I want my character to complete a full jump cycle without having to hold the arrow-up key down.
I want to be able to press down on the key once and release to do a complete jump.
Do I need to somehow include a do while loop? :confused
Thanks! 
bool jumping;
const float step = 0.05f; const float limit = 1.0f;
if (GetAsyncKeyState(VK_UP)== TRUE) {
static float jump = 0.0f;
static float strength = limit;
if(jumping){
jump += step;
if(jump <= limit){
strength -= step;
player.y += (step * strength);
}
else{
strength += step;
if(player.y - (step * strength) <= 0.0f)){
player.y = 0.0f;
jumping = false; jump = 0.0f;
strength = limit; }
else{
player.y -= (step * strength);
}
}
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
OK, this code is posted "out of context" (it simply starts with the "if" statement, not how you got there).
A reasonable assumption given your problem statement is that this code is run as part of an "OnChar()" or other event *caused* by your holding a key down.
If that's the case, and you want to convert this to code that runs in a loop, you need to address two things.
1) what event starts the "jumping"?
2) what event stops the "jumping"?
Clearly, right now event 1) is you holding down a key, event 2) is when you let it go. Letting the key go is *not* an event, it's the absence of a key_down event. You'll need to figure out the "stop" event first.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chuck O'Toole,
thanks for the quick reply.
These are global variables:
bool jumping;
const float step = 0.05f;
const float limit = 1.0f;
And the rest of the code below is contained inside of my game rendering function. The jump code works when I press the arrow-key, it just does't work correctly.
BOOL StartGame ()
{
if (GetAsyncKeyState(VK_UP)== TRUE)
{
static float jump = 0.0f;
static float strength = limit;
if(jumping){
jump += step;
if(jump <= limit){
strength -= step;
player.y += (step * strength);
}
else{
strength += step;
if(player.y - (step * strength) <= 0.0f)){
player.y = 0.0f;
jumping = false;
jump = 0.0f;
strength = limit;
}
else{
player.y -= (step * strength);
}
}
}
return TRUE;
}
|
|
|
|
|
If I got you: use a tristate variable instead of a boolean, say jump_state.
enum JumpState
{
JS_IDLE,
JS_START,
JS_JUMPING
};
jump_state = JS_IDLE;
if (GetAsyncKeyState(VK_UP) == TRUE)
if (jump_state == JS_IDLE)
jump_state = JS_START;
else
if (jump_state == JS_START)
jump_state == JS_JUMPING;
if ( jump_state == JUMPING)
{
if ( landed )
jump_state == JS_IDLE;
}
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey guys,
thanks again for y'alls help. I got it working now. You guys are great!
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome.
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
I am doing interprocess communication bwtween a, DOS console program
and a windows program using named pipes
I need to allocate an object that will remain active while communication is going on between the DOS consile app and the Windows
I know that typically object is allocated on the stack
E.g however if I use the new operator would that
Leave the object alkocated until I do a delete
|
|
|
|
|
ForNow wrote: if I use the new operator would that
Leave the object alkocated until I do a delete
Yes - see here[^].
Binding 100,000 items to a list box can be just silly regardless of what pattern you are following. Jeremy Likness
|
|
|
|
|
what type of object are you talking about, is it class-object or any primitive type. in both case you can take services of auto_ptr and stl::list class to keep you object alive between communication and once your program exit, stl and auto_ptr will take care of destruction of your object.
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You
|
|
|
|
|
You will need to look at the various ways of sharing data between processes, it can be a little complicated.
When you use the new opperator you are allocating storage on the heap, however each process has its own heap, and the addresses in one process' heap and not usually accessible to another process, but the can be done using interprocess messaging.
Windows hooks are another very powerful way for processes to share memory, but there is no 'global' memory in windows.
And yes, you need to use delete to free the memory.
==============================
Nothing to say.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not looking for a method of communicationg between process for that I am using named pipes
What I am looking for is persistent storage storage that will remain allocated between the interprcess communocation calls
|
|
|
|
|
Dude, I'm sure *you* know what you're talking about but it's not coming through in your posts.
You have 2 programs, a "Client" and a "Server" using pipes. You have a "System" where these two program are running.
Where do you want this "persistent" object to live, in one program or the other or in the operating system (Windows)? What do you want this object for? Depending on what you are going to do with the object, some objects are better than others.
Unless you are clear as to what you want it for and where it's to live, you will get some pretty unstatisfying suggestions, like "Open a file, that'll persist"
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
