|
Rohan Leuva wrote: Its far better than other Articles and Tips which for example
I agree. I didn't say anything about the quality.
Rohan Leuva wrote: then either its case of plagiarism
I don't think so, it is pretty clear that author is the same person
Rohan Leuva wrote: to be posted as blog.
That is part of my point.
The other part is about the site driving.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: The other part is about the site driving
And my statement "Its far better than other Articles and Tips which for example" was in the same context. I didn't mean quality.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
then let's see what others mean
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This "solution," posted today to a question asked in 2009: [^].
Is followed by another "solution" dated today from someone who has had no prior activity for six years on CP: [^].
The OP's latest activity on CP seems to have been in January, this year.
I find this ... uhhhh ... strange.
By the way, I got admonished today for posting a comment on a QA thread I didn't realize was a few years old: I saw it in the "Active" queue, and assumed it was "fresh."
My personal choice is not to respond to very old threads/messages unless the OP has modified the question, and there's something I find exceptional/compelling in the thread, but I don't advocate my personal choice as a "rule" for anyone else.
«If you search in Google for 'no-one ever got fired for buying IBM:' the top-hit is the Wikipedia article on 'Fear, uncertainty and doubt'» What does that tell you about sanity in these times?
|
|
|
|
|
I usually leave a comment like "How come that you landed in a X years old question?" or something similar.
If the same user does it in very similar questions, most probably is to promote a blog or something like that, what usually ends being nuked.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Solution treated. Member added to the list : "Being monitored.."
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
|
Answers deleted.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fossils still alive
~R@JEES#
|
|
|
|
|
It is difficult to nuke them, since a full thread is hanging around.
Actually the only full spam is the first message of the thread, the other two are more like defending the reasons why he posted but contain no links (if I am not blind)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
How did you open the messages? When I try, the links just go to the first page of the Lounge.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
That means that the spam message was probably nuked with a big hammer
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes you are right.It's gone now
~R@JEES#
|
|
|
|
|
|
Again, spam deleted, member ready for a boot in the ...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messages deleted, spammer lives on...briefly, we hope.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
As per title.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
|
|
|
|
|