|
So, just get a guy to pee for you?
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
As long as I don't have to transport poo
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Under the new Cloud Native Computing Foundation, container companies will coordinate efforts to create a common stack for containerized apps. Containers are the new Linux (cajillion nearly identical versions)?
|
|
|
|
|
CISOs should be pushing staff who oversee patch management to install an out-of band Microsoft fix for a critical Windows vulnerability in the way Adobe Type Manager Library handles OpenType fonts. Major Windows issue. Oh wait, "ADOBE Type Manager". That explains things.
|
|
|
|
|
What a bunch of wing-dings.
|
|
|
|
|
Emergency fix ?
How is it possible, I thought they were on Continuous fix delivery.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft seems intent to make its digital assistant Cortana culturally fluent. The jokes are on the other side of the street?
|
|
|
|
|
But does she know to switch herself off and on again?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm actually starting to feel a bit better
|
|
|
|
|
The Billy Connolly and/or Frankie Boyle add-in might be interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone give a monkeys?
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Comes with the entire back catalog of Monty Python, H2G2, Eddie Izzard and Stephen Fry.
|
|
|
|
|
Well... it could have been australian humor
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: British humor LMAO! As if! What an oxymaroon.
Decrease the belief in God, and you increase the numbers of those who wish to play at being God by being “society’s supervisors,” who deny the existence of divine standards, but are very serious about imposing their own standards on society.-Neal A. Maxwell
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
A total of 595.2 terabytes (TB) of data is exposed on the internet via publicly accessible MongoDB instances that don't require any form of authentication. NoSecurity?
|
|
|
|
|
The problem with new technology is that there typically isn't a lot of documentation on how to properly implement. Though surprised, I probably shouldn't be. I tend to let new technologies mature; so I don't waste time learning or worse, have security problems that will affect my users.
|
|
|
|
|
Just to understand better the English language...
- "A total of 595.2 terabytes (TB) of data is exposed on the internet ..."
Shouldn't be "ARE exposed"? Isn't that "(many) data" and not just a "(single) datum"?
Again, isn't that "the Internet" requires the capital letter?
Thanks from a hopeless user trying to communicate with the rest of the world...
|
|
|
|
|
Mario Vernari wrote: Shouldn't be "ARE exposed"? Isn't that "(many) data" and not just a "(single) datum"?
You are correct. However, since the corruption of the English language in the last century, "data" has been taken by many to be singular (e.g. the data is, rather than the data are).
I don't like it, but I also don't feel like fighting all the people who use incorrect English
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
modified 21-Jul-15 3:32am.
|
|
|
|
|
Historically, you would be correct, but in modern usage data is typically used as both singular and plural, and the usage "data is" is more common.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Mario Vernari wrote: Shouldn't be "ARE exposed"? Isn't that "(many) data" and not just a "(single) datum"? No. Most folks get this wrong, but in proper English you'd use "are" if you're referring to multiples of something and "is" for a singular. And while it is more than one TB, it's referring to the size as a whole single unit.
For instance...
A herd of sheep is flocking.
Twenty sheep are flocking.
Both refer to the fact there is more than one sheep, but the former is doing so as a whole, which is singular in nature.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Well, thanks (everybody) for the explanations.
Your last example makes sense: is the same in Italian. However, I think that's because the "is" actually refers to the "herd", which is one.
What's different is the "data" usage. In Italian it is almost non sense talking about a "single" data, unless we're explicitly referring to a specific part of the bunch. Generally speaking, the context refers to "many" data, especially when they sum hundreds of TB!
Thanks again!
|
|
|
|
|
Mario Vernari wrote: In Italian it is almost non sense talking about a "single" data You got it right.
It's a bit of a gray area I'd wager, but data refers to a whole, much like water. You don't say you have 4 liters of waters, it's 4 liters of water. Water is the whole and liter a measurement. Which means the water is one and the measurement is plural - just like with the word herd. And just like with data, whereas TB is just a measurement.
So for instance...
Liters of water are hard to measure in that glass.
The water is hard to measure in liters in that glass.
We're talking about the same thing, just one focuses on the measurement (like a TB) and one focuses on the collective whole (just like with data).
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: NoSecurity?
- excellent!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|