|
They offer buying a Mac as the best alternative.
The best way to improve Windows is run it on a Mac.
The best way to bring a Mac to its knees is to run Windows on it.
~ my brother Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
My no update experience is already very smooth.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
How's that possible? What about the "Update has been scheduled" friend of ours?
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Do they now ask if and what you want to update?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Last trend is automatic update.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I know... but they should not force to that.
For non-tech people I find it OK, but I want to have the possibility to choose what I want and/or what I don't
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Windows 10 Mobile hasn’t officially rolled out to consumer devices yet, but we’re already seeing some documentation about the end-of-life treatment for the latest mobile operating system from Microsoft. Will they ship it before then?
|
|
|
|
|
I can sense a new Windows coming out sooner.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
|
You missed the whole meeting. By ending support before the product ships, they will clean up on marketing, production and support costs. It's a double win!
I would say a triple win, but support is through Stack Overflow anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
With IncludeOS, developers write a cloud service in C++ and bring in the IncludeOS libraries. When compiled, the result is a disk image that contains the application and the few OS components needed to run it. The image can then be booted and run on a modern hypervisor; Linux's KVM and VirtualBox are currently supported. C++ on Rails?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, what problem does this solve? I honestly think these things are a solution in search of a problem.
We're doing it backwards, people! Get your act together and start moving forward!
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
It's ok - maybe in 30 years there will be problems for which this is a good halfway-through solution. Let the creatives create!
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
"just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: VirtualBox are currently supported.
So let me get this straight. I need a computer running an OS. That OS has to run VirtualBox. I then need to load an OS on VirtualBox. And THEN I can run my C++ app with whatever crap IncludeOS adds on to it? Maybe I don't need the OS on VB, but I still need an OS to run VB.
Did you follow all that?
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
As pointed out a solution looking for a problem to solve.
Does this mean they can shove it onto a PI or something...
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Words can be inspiring, even when they're arranged into vague, fancy-sounding sequences that seem deep but say nothing. This article is sooooooo profound!
|
|
|
|
|
It is. Have you seen this?
“On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit”
Judgement and Decision Making, Vol. 10 No. 6, Nov 2015
Funding for this study was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Copyright: © 2015. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo ON, Canada, N2L 3G1. Email: gpennyco@uwaterloo.ca. †Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo. The School of Humanities and Creativity, Sheridan College.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Whoa! Even more profound when I'm reading the original!
I'm glad to have paid my small fraction of that NSERC grant.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Words can be inspiring, even when they're arranged into vague, fancy-sounding sequences that seem deep but say nothing.
Just go to any modern art gallery and read about a painting or sculpture. Lots of fancy-sounding sequences that seem deep but say nothing. Though I don't have the "inspired" experience, just the "what a load of BS" experience.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Lots of fancy-sounding sequences that seem deep but say nothing.
And highly probable has actually nothing to do with the real intention / feelings of the artist.
I will never understand art.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: I will never understand art critics.
FTFY
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Actually both
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: ...arranged into vague, fancy-sounding sequences that seem deep but say nothing. Ever listened to a mainstream economist? Or politicians? It's the essence of bull****.
|
|
|
|
|
You mean the ones who monotonectally reconceptualize front-end relationships to quickly repurpose equity invested users?
|
|
|
|
|
I understand the purpose of the study, but I cannot agree for if you have never experienced this source through non-local interactions, it can be difficult to reflect.
Clearly the writers miss that point completely
|
|
|
|