|
|
Spammer looking rather unhealthy.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Article in moderation How To Use Eloquent with Slim Micro Framework[^] smells a little like pink meat ... see link after Quote: Since I've deployed the application on
I may be being a little unforgiving today so do read the article before reporting
|
|
|
|
|
Check out the author: Shahroz Nawaz - Professional Profile[^] - "Technical lead, Cloudways" - and the link goes to which company website?
Your instincts are correct, as usual!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
A single link to a technical blog hosted on his companies web site but related to the article?
You are both quite strict today.
|
|
|
|
|
Well if wasn't his first, then maybe. But ... it's a rubbish article, which looks like it's supposed to be independent, but links to his company? Dodgy, at best ...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I had the wrong link. See my below post.
|
|
|
|
|
Easy mistake to make!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
From my point of view there is nothing to report.
The link points to a blog written by him. So it is perfectly valid that he re-uses the code from there.
Or do you think that it is site driving?
|
|
|
|
|
It wasn't so much the code as the links that he included, so I thought he was possibly site driving ... I haven't even clicked the report yet as I still can't make my mind up. I used to be so decisive but not I'm not so sure
The link that concerned me goes to the home page of a "start free but pay for it really" hosting company ... that the Author works for and not to any blog.
|
|
|
|
|
For some reason I thought the link was to his blog (at the same site) and not to the hosting page (landed there by checking for plagiarism)
That link is indeed spam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|