|
|
A tutorial is an article that provides step-by-step explanations and walk-throughs of concepts. The articles you mentioned were marked as tutorials by accident and have been corrected.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
We ban anonymous posts in the lounge, judging by recent trolls and flamebait posts in the soapbox I think anonymous posts should be banned there too.
Michael
'War is at best barbarism...Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell.' - General William Sherman, 1879
|
|
|
|
|
If I ban anonymous posts in the soapbox then it will mean that anonymous flameers will just go to other forums and cause havoc there. We need to Soapbox to allow people to let off steam in whichever form they desire.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
...to prevent the posting of a rating for an article without an explanation of the reason for that rating. It really sucks when your given a poor rating with no explanation of why. Implementing something like this would help to give a programmer more feedback on what's good, and what needs to be improved
It's good to see kids turning their minds to wholesum activities such as programming, instead of wasting their lives in the hedonistic disciplines of Sex, Drugs, & Rock & Roll... or Sex with Drugs, or Sex with Rocks while Rolling in Drugs, or whatever new-fangled perversions you little monsters have thought up now...
[Shog9 on Kid Programmers]
|
|
|
|
|
I think that quote got screwed up...
It's good to see kids turning their minds to wholesum activities such as programming, instead of wasting their lives in the hedonistic disciplines of Sex, Drugs, & Rock & Roll... or Sex with Drugs, or Sex with Rocks while Rolling in Drugs, or whatever new-fangled perversions you little monsters have thought up now...
[Shog9 on Kid Programmers]
|
|
|
|
|
John Aldrich wrote:
to prevent the posting of a rating for an article without an explanation of the reason
This has been mentioned lots of times in the past. The general conclusions are that we'd end up with reasons full of garbage rather than anything useful. People who want to leave comments will, those who just want to give low scores and not provide feedback should just be ignored.
Michael
'War is at best barbarism...Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell.' - General William Sherman, 1879
|
|
|
|
|
How about we are able to get a list of who voted and what their vote was? Then you can find out who did it, spam their mailbox, find out where they live, burn down their parent's house, kidnap their cat, feed chicken bones to their dog, throw them in a deep pit, have them rub lotion on their skin until they are all prunish, then make them confess as to why they voted your article poorly.
Perhaps I just need my medication adjusted.
|
|
|
|
|
The loungers may have noticed this great message from Mr. Wright.
It would be sad if such useful information were lost, wouldn't it? So, what about a new "Tourism" section in CP?
Silence Means Death
Stand On Your Feet
Inner Fear
Your Worst Enemy
Refuse! Resist!
|
|
|
|
|
When I try to upload files, I got the following error. It happened atleast 5 or 6 times.
Oops!<br />
There is a problem with the page you are trying to reach.<br />
<br />
Please try the following:<br />
<br />
Click the Refresh button, or try again later if this error persists.<br />
<br />
Open the CodeProject home page, and then look for links to the information you want (although this is probably not going to help if the information you need is on this page). <br />
Error info: <br />
<br />
Page: /script/Submit/EditArticle4.asp<br />
Time: Tuesday, June 24, 2003, 1:33:31 PM<br />
Server: Web6<br />
Category: Dundas.Upload.2 <br />
The webmaster has been informed about this error.
"...if you don't want to hear things that piss you off don't piss off other people. SIMPLE." - Steven Hicks This signature was created by "Code Project Quoter".
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nice to be able to attach file(s) to a post, eliminating the huge messages that result when posting some code. It would also make the site faster.
The same goes for the "send Email" feature.
onwards and upwards...
|
|
|
|
|
Good idea!
Paul
I don't think anyone should write their autobiography until after they're dead. - Samuel Goldwyn
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
I've changed the format of the 'What's New[^]' list of new articles. It's a little cleaner and includes article scores - but is it useful? Does it make it easier to follow?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I like the listing options - good job!
One thing, though - it makes it easier for my eyes to do a "sweep-over" if each day has some kind of box around it. (Maybe have a light orange box for each day.)
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God." - Jesus
"You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi
|
|
|
|
|
> Does it make it easier to follow?
Not really. The background colour is terribly white and not much
difference between visited/non-visited links. Frankly I liked
the old softer colour better. How about setting this in
'Personal Settings'.
Just my 0.02 €.
Gisle V.
"If you feel paranoid it doesn't mean they're not after you!" -- Woody Allen
|
|
|
|
|
There, you said just what I wanted to say, but said it better.
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God." - Jesus
"You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi
|
|
|
|
|
's ok... For some odd reason though, i find myself cocking my head to the side as i read, as though it were in a mirror or upside down.
Maybe i've just been at work too long...
Shog9
drifting along
with the tumbling tumbleweeds...
|
|
|
|
|
I liked the old format better, at least the colorization. IIRC there has been an option to toggle between two display modes, hasn't there?
Regards
Thomas
Disclaimer: Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
The only thing I would change would be to add a heavy orange <hr> between each day's articles. That would help me be able to glance over each day's entries.
Maybe a smaller line between each section within a day as well, to make it easier to tell which article is in which section (this would be especially helpful when there are several groups in a row, each with one article)
The layout, icons, scores are all fine. I don't mind the lack of colors, however in the old layout the different colors did provide the visual separators that I now miss.
--Mike--
"So where does that leave us? Well, it leaves us right back where we started, only more confused than before." -- Matt Gullett
Ericahist | Homepage | RightClick-Encrypt | 1ClickPicGrabber
|
|
|
|
|
I don't particulary care for the stark white background, especially since all of the other pages have nicer colors. The article scores don't really help me, because if I am interested in a certain topic, I'll read the article anyway. Afterwards, I may agree that it should have the low or high score it got. But, since the score won't affect my decision to read or not read an article, it is superfluous.
The new/update/moved indicators are alright, but since the page is titled "What's New," I would expect everything I see there to be "new" in some way. If an article has a name that I remember seeing earlier, then I can assume it is an update. It's not new because I remembered seeing it before, and it wouldn't be on the "What's New" page if something hadn't happened to it. Therefore, those indicators are superfluous too.
I do like the categories, though, as that helps me ignore things that are of little interest or to focus on areas that are of more interest.
Dave
"You can say that again." -- Dept. of Redundancy Dept.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris!
It's easier to follow yes, though it would be very very nice to add something like
an article id to all articles for referencing. It's easier to tell other people about
problems they have. "Look at article CP-12312131 .. " know what I mean?
greetz, peter
_______________________________________________
Peter Schneider, MCT - MCSD.NET - MCAD.NET - MCDBA
"If a problem cannot be solved, enlarge it!"
|
|
|
|
|
I liked the original format better.
onwards and upwards...
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the article is still around then our system usually finds it. If it's gone then it's gone. (yes, this can be polished a bit )
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Any chance of a picture of the new CP systems... The 10 machines lying around in Canada... The one on the about us page looks old.
Regards,
Brian Dela
|
|
|
|