|
Better than more than a quarter being false negatives!
What a bunch of whiners. A 26% false positive rate seems reasonable for this and shouldn't cause undue stress. And security is a big industry, so where's all the vaunted "machine learning" and AI?
|
|
|
|
|
I hate falsies.
There should be laws against improper use of silicon.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Now, you can stay in touch with your team, triage issues, and even merge code, right from your mobile device, anywhere. Now you can break the build with your phone
|
|
|
|
|
Why is it that whenever the word "mobile" turns up in a planning discussion, the term "YAGNI" flies out of the window and disappears into infinity?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
If you’re interested in tech, you’ve likely heard about the race to develop quantum computers. Yes and no
|
|
|
|
|
It's keeping a lot of journalists employed, so there's that.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I wouldn't like to work in a quantum job.
I don't want to see my monthly income vanish only because I looked at it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: I don't want to see my monthly income vanish only because I looked at it. Yours lasts that long?
Lucky pig!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
People who make hardware will just make different hardware, and people who write code will just write it against different operating systems, so no.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I saw four high-paying contract jobs advertised about a year or so ago. They didn't look like vapour-ware from the descriptions. I gather that even without the hardware they've been able to use QC to improve classical algorithms for machine learning etc.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft prepares developers to adopt its modern WinUI user interface platform. Because XAML^H^H^H^HSilv^H^H^H^HUWP^H^H^H WinUI is the future!
|
|
|
|
|
Some cretiun sais: "WinUI is powered by a highly optimized C++ core that delivers blistering performance, long battery life ...
Battery life?
Since when has battery life been an issue when coding?
...
Oh, sorry.
Stupid me.
This old fossil hasn't yet moved on to the stage where he writes all his code on his mobile phone.
Don't worry; I'll wake up to The Way of the Future! one day.
But seriously: if optimising for battery life is one of the main criteria in the design of an IDE, there is something failing miserably in the brains of the people in charge of the project.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The history of defect tracking in the Windows team goes back to Windows 1.0, which used a text file. Back when men were men, and bugs were fixed
Sorry to go all burly and genderist on you there.
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond, who only has one name, like Rihanna, said: I think Windows 95 went through three RAID databases during its life Wait a minute...
Developers for windows '95 were using 8-Bit systems?
Jeeze, that explains So Much!
Raymond, who only has one name, like Madonna, said: I liked to joke that we should just get rid of that middle tier. It’s always the one that’s causing problems. As opposed to real life, where it's always the guys at the top and the guys at the bottom who cause all the problems, and us guys in the middle have to live with all their sh1t.
Raymond, who only has one name, like Cher, said: Product Studio kept things going until Windows 8 But only as a makework, because the team had absolutely nothing to do -- very few bugs were ever reported for windows 8, because almost no-one ever used the PoC (no, that's not "Proof of Concept").
Oops! Missed a bit.
Raymond, who only has one name, like Divine, said: Product Studio kept things going until Windows 8, at which point Windows switched to on-premise Team Foundation Services for work item tracking Because using cloud services provided by an external entity is just stupid, isn't it?
Raymond, who only has one name, like Fido, said: Even Azure DevOps wasn’t big enough to contain all of the Windows work items. That's because bugs are a cumulative thing.
The more of them you ignore and don't fix, the more of them you end up with.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It is our hope this newest release will also brighten your day. Visual Studio 2019 version 16.5 contains anticipated new features from XAML, .NET, C++ and Debugging. Find the new bugs before all your friends!
Or at least the old bugs they didn't fix because "as designed"
|
|
|
|
|
If it doesn't use .NET 11, you're wasting your time -- I won't tell you again!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
But.. this is old news! I got that one since at least 21 hours!
|
|
|
|
|
According to a new study, however, one widely used algorithmic approach for modeling these networks is fundamentally flawed, failing to capture important properties of real-world complex networks. So let's call the whole thing off
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Study shows widely used machine learning methods don't work as claimed We are saying it for a while... does it mean we could have got their funds? Damn it
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Fancy-schmancy buzzword-filled apps fail to deliver everything their marketing departments promise?
I don't believe it for a second.
The guy claims that low-dimensional embeddings are a big part of the problem, so the obvious solution is to embiggen them*.
* If you don't watch The Simpsons in English[^], you might not get that one.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
We have said this many times, but we will reiterate again; .NET Core and then .NET 5 is the .NET you should build all your NEW applications with. Aaaaaaand it's already deprecated for .NET 6... Oh, sorry, 7. Scratch that...
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: We have said this many times, but we will reiterate again; .NET Core and then .NET 5 is the .NET you should build all your NEW applications with. Y'know, when someone talks to me like that, I instantly want to tell them to go f*** themselves.
Who the Hell does he think he is?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
A lot have been written about the dangers of “Undefined behavior” in C. No, it's not 'compile'
|
|
|
|
|
I can't believe that a guy who's complaining about one misplaced word is OK with using google translate to convert his paper into English!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It didn't seem auto-translated to me. Just extremely poorly written. It's like he barely speaks caveman.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|