|
with account 15387266 and previous. Sorry, I did not spam I did not break the rules!!!
modified 5-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
+5 for using the word praxis.
-5 for using too many exclamation points.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
corrected -!-!
modified 6-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
This: The Lounge[^]
Not sure whether you have the original source available, but the plain message and its representation does differ a lot
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure what I'm meant to be seeing here.
Can you post the plain text message as a reply to this message here?
Be sure to check "Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML", below so there's no stripping or processing of the text.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
My previous account has been released by your watch dogs...
The message was the below, but here I used replaced < and > by '& lt' and '& gt' (without space of course)
(1957)
<link>
JAILHOUSE ROCK (1957)
<link>
68' Comeback
<link>
|
|
|
|
|
If you post content wrapped in angle brackets (<,>), while also leaving "Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML" unchecked, then the system will think you're trying to include a HTML tag and will treat it accordingly (ie probably remove it since it's improper HTML)
Much easier: simply past the URL directly into the message: JAILHOUSE ROCK (1957) - Elvis Presley - Classic Movie Musical Numbers - YouTube[^]
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Holy sh*t what is here? Every message becomes first 'under review'?
|
|
|
|
|
No, no simply paste... that I did and then I disapeard as a member. The one above was only to try to explain because of what post I disapeard...
The post with these real (abusive?) links was then my end here
|
|
|
|
|
OK, so I don't understand what you pasted and what you expected to see
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Btw. You recoverd the link which I did not mentioned here. From where you have this?
I assume from the original message.
If yes:
Why the post with such harmless links has been deleted?
Why that previous account (posted the 'elvis' links in question) has finally removed?
|
|
|
|
|
- I got the link from Google
- Posts that have links are what spammers post. Our spam AI thought your post looked like all the spam we get and so marked it as spam and sent it to moderation. Nothing personal...
- I haven't looked at your previous account. If the members collectively decided you were posting spam, or being abusive, or being a troll, then your account would have been removed. I'm happy to reinstate accounts for members who wish to contribute constructively to our code-sharing community.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
He's Chris Maunder, he has a very particular set of skills, skills he has acquired over a very long career.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
So he is the sublime of x to conclude on this link
modified 6-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
And you are getting too close to the troll limit. So please chill out a bit and don't be disrespectful with the ones trying to help you (a.k.a. Chris).
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah. Do we really, really, really need it? It's becoming a Denial of Service.
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
We do.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
There is a bunch of message closed in the board of the weekly poll.
Could someone with a big hammer clean that up? Going one message at a time is a bit annoying.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
See what you mean - three pages worth!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
✅ Done
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Matthew
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew, what happens to a message when we reject it in the automated detector list?
With questions and answers, they don't appear anywhere, so I suspect they are deleted "properly".
Does the same happen with messages as well?
If it does, would it be possible to delete the placeholder "this message is under review" rather than replace it with "message closed"?
That way, the forums wouldn't get clogged up with "closed messages" like they do sometimes at the moment?
It looks like Mr Keyboard is stepping up his game and while we can cope with kicking his sock puppets, he's leaving a fair bit of mess behind him.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
The buggers are persistent...
One page and a half again with message closed.
Could you have a look again please?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
All clean.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|