|
The dev environment is vi. Basically, it sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
Basically, it sucks.
Basically it *DOES* really sucks.
    
Farhan Noor Qureshi
|
|
|
|
|
Why don't you develop with Apache/PHP on NT or 2000? Use the editor of choice (like ConTEXT) or one of the PHP IDEs that are emerging (although I hate their open source Delhpi editor control).
When finished, test it on a Linux box or your webhost.
Works for me...
Victor
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to C++/Windows/MFC/ASP/etc., I also work with Ada 95, real-time, concurrent, safety-critical software development.
WillCodeForMoney
|
|
|
|
|
George, I feel for you. I do ADA development ( see post above ). However, that safety critical stuff is crap. Just try finding the following code embedded in 100K LOC after several calls to the compiler developers for help:
function ">" ( L,R : in A_Package.Our_Real_Type )
return BOOLEAN renames A_Package.">=";
This is a real example and wasted about 3 weeks of 4 developers time.
BTW, that code was really Ada83 and I am aware of 'use type' in Ada95 and am swapping out renames as quick as I can find them.
When religion and politics help drive the same cart, they tend to drive faster and faster until it is too late to stop when they see the cliff ahead -- Frank Herbert.
|
|
|
|
|
Do I read this ight? Did they replace the ">" for their "own" real type with ">=" ?????
I dion't Ada, but I fel your pain
|
|
|
|
|
I believe that the mistake happened when an algorithm was rewritten. The original code used <= to test for the exit condition on a loop. The code was changed to use a > test for readability. When the rename that exposed the function to the package was edited, the coder changed the < to > but overlooked the =
That is what I mean when I say that Ada is not nearly as safe as people (read US Government) would like us to believe.
When religion and politics help drive the same cart, they tend to drive faster and faster until it is too late to stop when they see the cliff ahead -- Frank Herbert.
|
|
|
|
|
The Poll Which asks what Languages or Tools we are using currently is really bad. I mean I posted my vote( which is JAVA sorry microsoft) , and then when the results showed it added up to 67.4% doing Straight C/C++ and 76.3% doing MFC (already this is well over 100%) I dunno maybe its some new Microsoft Percentage thing but all the technologies added up are well over the 100% Mark
Just a Comment
LK--<
|
|
|
|
|
That would be because you are allowed to select more than one option... It does make sense. For example, working in Java wouldn't necessarily stop you using C++ as well.
Gavin Greig
|
|
|
|
|
As Greg said - it's multi choice.
Just trying to find out what you guys want to read about that fits in with the Visual Studio theme we've got going here.
If there's 100 people jumping up and down saying 'Java rocks my world' then we look into it. At the moment though we're more interested in things like 'do we try and help people with Managed C++, or is everyone still battling with MFC'
cheers,
Chris Maunder (CodeProject)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
