Survey Results

FirstPrev Next

Re: Whidbey usage Colin Angus Mackay19-Sep-04 22:32 Colin Angus Mackay 19-Sep-04 22:32  Nishant S wrote: I wonder how many people are using VS.NET Whidbey for production code I voted for it because I am doing testing with it. No production code development is being done with it - although looking at some of the new features available (with the IDE and the language and .NET Framework enhancements) I can't help being impatient. Do you want to know more? Not getting the response you want from a question asked in an online forum: How to Ask Questions the Smart Way! Re: Whidbey usage Davide Zaccanti20-Sep-04 0:30 Davide Zaccanti 20-Sep-04 0:30  First of all I've to say that we use (at present) only the C++ compiler with unmanaged code.. ( so no C#, ASP, etc. with reselled product) I'll use 2003 version for production code but I'll test (weekly) all code with Whidbey to insure future portability (and I'm still working on porting all legacy code to work in both environment... really form some cases also with VC 6.00). Tha same approach with SQL Server 2000 and Yukon.. We try to prepare ourself to the day we need to change version Davide Re: Whidbey usage «_Superman_»19-Sep-04 22:38 «_Superman_» 19-Sep-04 22:38  I would guess 0. Do you think or have you heard of anybody, in your experience, who use production tools especially those like VS.NET for production? Just curious... « Superman » Re: Whidbey usage Paul Watson20-Sep-04 3:16 Paul Watson 20-Sep-04 3:16  >who use production tools especially those like VS.NET for production VS.NET? As in 2002 or 2003? Plenty of people use those for production code, especially in web-dev circles thanks to ASP.NET. 2005, hopefully nobody or very few do. regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass South Africa Michael Dunn wrote: "except the sod who voted this a 1, NO SOUP FOR YOU" Crikey! ain't life grand? Re: Whidbey usage «_Superman_»20-Sep-04 21:55 «_Superman_» 20-Sep-04 21:55  Sorry, I meant the beta version. I use 2003 myself, mostly for non-web development. « Superman » Re: Whidbey usage Shog920-Sep-04 5:53 Shog9 20-Sep-04 5:53  I use it for editing production XSL templates, as the editor in VS2k5 provides better support for this than VS2k3 does. That's about it though. You're one microscopic cog in his catastrophic plan... Re: Whidbey usage Poolbeer20-Sep-04 7:21 Poolbeer 20-Sep-04 7:21  I mainly use VS 2003 for live code, but already use VS 2005 for production that will be released after VS2005 goes live (RTM). I find VS 2005 pretty stable although some things are a little harder to do (unfinished features). So basically I use it for production code Speak Out! Use the Source, Luke! (Dr. GUI .NET #5) Re: Whidbey usage Jacob Koppang20-Sep-04 15:06 Jacob Koppang 20-Sep-04 15:06  Hopefully none. It's against the usage policy and terms to use it for production. On top of that... it's still in beta and greatly unstable. I'm using it just to play around with and get geared up for the release of it. I hope they hurry (ha). Edited: I accidentally said that it was "stable". Oopsie. Manuet Systems http://www.manuet.com Re: Whidbey usage WillemM20-Sep-04 21:22 WillemM 20-Sep-04 21:22  I am currently not using VS2005 for production code. This is simply because the program is not ready. But I use VS2005 for testing purposes of future applications. Like my own application core, which I hope to finish next year "Every rule in a world of bits and bytes can be bend or eventually be broken"

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 9-Oct-24 21:24 Refresh ᐊ Prev123

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.