|
Practical experience is almost always preferred. The aptitude of the individual is very important as well. I’ve worked with folks without a diploma who were amazing developers, and some with diplomas who really needed to think about changing careers. The converse is true as well.
As for me, I only have a High School diploma. I have some Microsoft certifications, but they are old now and were only used to get in the door. Now that my resume has “matured”, I have no problem getting in.
It's only when you look at an ant through a magnifying glass on a sunny day that you realise how often they burst into flames.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe an exact option for "Some College" (no degree) might have been good as well.
I worked for both of my colleges(!) as a programmer and then asst. Sys Admin while I attended them. I realized that I was not learning anything more after my third year and I stopped attending classes in the middle of my second semester of my third year. No degree earned.
Where would that fit in with the above selections?
Peace!
-=- James If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong! Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road! DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
A drop out
Only joking
"a fool will not learn from a wise man, but a wise man will learn from a fool"
"It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed." - Theodore Roosevelt
"Success is going from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
My Website || My Blog
|
|
|
|
|
No problem! I know that leaving college was my best decision and I am proud to say that I am a college dropout!
Peace!
-=- James If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong! Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road! DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I have a degree in "Computer Science" and doing Masters in Computer Science as well.I haveto freeze one term becuase I have to travel abroad on a company project. As I m going back to Pakistan next week, I have no mode to start my study again but I spent a handsome amount so far. . I think I have to restart
|
|
|
|
|
While I have a degree in "Computer Science," it's really just a piece of paper; especially now, 25 years or so after the fact. It always seemed to me that the part of my degree relevant to programming could have been taught in high school; and that the "liberal arts" portion of my college education was a joke by the standards of earlier generations.
*AND* regardless of the degree, what I do now (C# programming as opposed to COBOL programming) is self-taught. I brought the ability to think, analyze and learn with me when I left home for college.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a BEng in Electronice Engineering, which has nothing to do with what I do now. I also do C# and am self taught in that.
Words fade as the meanings change, but somehow, it don't bother me.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
After reading the "high school" message... I got to wondering if all of the those "high school coders" out there really know what they are doing or not.
For example you wouldn't let your doctor operate on you without attending medical school and then doing an internship to actually see if they can perform the job or not. But yet we allow coders that do not have any advanced degree to write code that controls all sorts of data, be it important or not without thinking twice about it.
I wonder what you think about this?
|
|
|
|
|
I do see that ~67% of the respondants do have a degree, but ~28% of the people coding do not
|
|
|
|
|
M i s t e r L i s t e r wrote:
I wonder what you think about this?
Doctors need a lab to learn; programmers need a computer. You don't need to go to college to find a computer.
I'm self-taught, and I think I'm better off for it (knowledge-wise) because I didn't have to go at the pace of the lowest common denominators in class.
|
|
|
|
|
There are important jobs that you don't need a degree for: Aircraft technician, Medical Equipment technician, Electrician, Car mechanic. Each of these people could end up killing someone if their jobs are not done correctly. But these are all jobs you can get into straight after school by showing that you have an aptitude for it (of course you do get on-job training etc. and you do have to write exams and get certified)
I found that while studying for my degree we used Java (and some courses used Delphi), but most people ended up getting jobs using Microsoft technologies (Sharepoint, Office, .NET, Biztalk, SQL Server). Not once while studying for my degree did I ever learn about any of these. Sure we learned about system design (which I had already learned in High School Comp. Science), computer theory (which I had already learned in High School) and there were other courses which, in the last 6 years, I have never had to use (Discrete Mathematics, Statistics). The first 2 years were repeats of my last 4 years at High School, the courses seemed to be designed for people who were starting from 0. My tertiary studies only proved useful for my employer, for them to have proof that I wasn't all talk.
All that being said, I do think that it is necessary to have some form of professional qualification (be it a diploma, MCTS, MCPD, Java Certs) when you enter the professional world. It forces you to learn things that you probably wouldn't have taught yourself and it also verifies to you that what you think you know, is correct. Eg. I did a course on HCI and that's something that has proved useful and it's something that I never could have taught myself (unless I had bought the textbooks and read through them).
-- modified at 4:48 Tuesday 7th November, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
smdo1982 wrote: It forces you to learn things that you probably wouldn't have taught yourself and it also verifies to you that what you think you know, is correct.
No it doesn't. A D is still passing. It doesn't prove you know your field well at all. Granted it never hurts to have a degree, but I think you get a better education outside of college. It depends the person and how much they really want to learn. The degree is secondary.
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't talking about a degree.
For most of the MS certs a D is not a pass you need 70%+. I do still maintain that it does force you to investigate topics that you otherwise would not have looked at. You may not be an expert at the end but at least you are aware that they exist.
I am agreeing with you as far as it isn't necessary to get a degree, and that real life experience is second to none
(I just realised I originally replied on the wrong message, I meant to reply to MisterLister, think this may have added some confusion... )
|
|
|
|
|
smdo1982 wrote: I just realised I originally replied on the wrong message, I meant to reply to MisterLister, think this may have added some confusion...
Oh well, it all works out in the end.
|
|
|
|
|
While it MAY be said that universities and the rest teach restrictive thinking, I have discovered from my interaction with software developers that the years of training within the walls of a classroom goes a long way in shaping how we eventually approach real life problems. After all, software if just a tool with which we solve problems. It is a means to an end and not the end in itself.
How much work would be accomplished in developing a solution for a specialized field without a thorough understanding of the field in itself?
While I write software every day, I am also studying for a PhD in Electronic and Electrical Engineering. I see the direct impact of my academics within my daily work.
Please don't mention Bill Gates because Microsoft has a lot of PhD (if not Profs) working in their development teams.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not the degree, it's the person behind it that was my point. A piece of paper is just that. Someone who wants to study hardcore computer science can do that just as easily outside of college.
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't worry about it - a degree is only a means to an end (learning and getting a job) and offers no guarantees as to proficiency. What really matters is experience.
As a case in point, my degree (Electronic & Electrical Engineering, specialising in RF Electronics and DSP) is almost completely irrelevant to my career. Furthermore, the software related content on my course was at nowhere near as advanced a level as I'd already reached by myself, and I learnt very little. They certainly taught nothing about the areas I specialise in now (software quality and user interface design).
My partner Beth didn't do a degree at all. It hasn't stopped her becoming something of a guru on low level COM or database design, either.
|
|
|
|
|
Here's some educational irony...
My Bachelor of Science project in college (to get the BSEE) was to program a TI DSP to detect certain heart rhythym patterns - tachycardia, fibrillation, etc. This was back in 1991-1992.
My current employer has an ongoing 'emergency care training program' in which some of us get CPR training, basic emergency skills training. etc. Since I had some 'biology training' I was selected as one of the people to be in this program.
Recently we were trained to use devices called Automatic Electronic Defibrillators - AED.
These devices can be used on people suffering from a heart attack to keep the heart going properly under certain kinds of attack.
So here is the irony: I am in training to use a device about 13 years after writing the software that would be similar to what is inside one. Even more ironic, is that I intiially interviewed to work for one of the companies that develops the AED, but that was for their lithotripter.
What do I do now? I fix multi-threading issues in our software that are caused by the newer dual-core systems, and I barely use my training in Biochemistry at all here at work
Any sufficiently gross incompetence is nearly indistinguishable from malice.
|
|
|
|
|
This is neither diploma, bachelor, master or whatever. It is more along the lines of an apprenticeship. Normally it takes between 3 to 3 and a half years to complete, with an examination at the end. I completed mine in two years (18 months collage/theoretical training, plus 6 months practical training in a company, which after completion took me on) after having worked as a "Radio-Fernsehtechniker" (technician) for 8 years. I´ve been working as a software developer (development / programming / technical documentation and training) for 5 years now, and have been looking for a job in Germany for a couple of months now(To broaden my horizon(s) ). As a native English speaker, with fluent German (both written and spoken) my profile fits a hell of a lot of jobs, however as soon as I mention that I have no degree, they no longer seem to be interested. Do not get me wrong, but here in Germany, the employers are more interested in what you are theoretically capable of (i.e. degree) than what you have actually archived and are capable of(proven work experience, completed projects etc.). Very depressing! How is this in comparison to other countries?
mfg
regards
-- modified at 4:17 Tuesday 7th November, 2006
Who the f*** is General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?
|
|
|
|
|
Well anywhere you go, for a professional job you do need a degree, otherwise the changes to obtain a god job is considerably low.
Consider your degree as a cake, and the experiences and certificaion are only the cream on the cake.
You have got the cream but since no cake, its useless.
Rahim Rattani
Software Engineer,
Matrix Systems (Pvt) Ltd.,
Karachi - Pakistan
|
|
|
|
|
This comment puzzles / perplexes me.
"Consider your degree as a cake experiences and certification are Only the cream on the cake"
I would rather say that the Degree is the cream, (which is mostly for decoration anyway, may taste nice, but is gone in the lick of a tounge) and the experiences are the cake (body and substance), i.e. the real nutritional value of the cake!
Carrying on using your method of explanation, we could all live happily ever after stuffing ourselves with chocolate eclairs (massive cream filling, next to no hunger stilling value) and never have to worry about our health regarding vitamins minerals etc.
Just food for thought !!!
mfg
regards
Who the f*** is General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm from Germany. I'm not sure about the meaning of diploma in this context.
In Germany Master and Diploma are almost the same. More precisions: All course at Universities will be changed from the diploma degree to the master degree in the near future.
But does a diploma have the same meaning in America, too?
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
diploma is completion of High School
|
|
|
|
|
Thats not correct,
in germany you will get a diploma only after successfull completion of a 4 or 5 year study on an university or technical higher school. Before this you have to finish the gynmasium ( after 12 or 13 years in a school ). Then you are 19 or 20 years old.
I think a gymnasium compares more to an american college.
German diploma == Master, that seems to be right.
Please refer the wikipedia for more details.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gymnasium_%28school%29
Olaf Herrmann
-- modified at 16:44 Monday 6th November, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
"But does a diploma have the same meaning in America, too?"
Being an American, I took 'Diploma' in this context to mean "General Equivalency Diploma" (GED for short).
In the US, education is generally free, as in Germany. But unlike in Germany we aspire (or, rather, pretend to aspire) to give all our students "the best" education. We pretend, for as long as possible in each student's academic career, that all students are really interested in learning more than the bare basics and that each is destined for university.
At the same time, our "educationists" tend to actually teach (I use the word advisedly) the vast majority of students in their charge by the lowest common denominator. Heaven forefend that Little Johnny's delicate self-esteem should be bruised by actually having to strive to accomplish (which would mean the risk of failure to accomplish exists) anything which might justify his possession of that carefully nurtured self-esteem.
Consequently, US high schools are full of students who don't want to be there and/or don't see that they're getting anything of value from their education. It's a fact of human nature that we tend not to value as highly those things which are "free" as compared to those things which we earn.
At the same time, once you're 16, you can legally emancipate yourself from the education bureaucracy. And, a very high percentage of our students do just that.
A few years later, they often realize that high school wasn't quite as worthless as they'd thought at the time. Perhaps they finally realize that education isn't something which happens *to* you, but rather is an on-going process that you do to yourself. Or, perhaps mere economics is the motivation -- generally, lack of a high school diploma limits one's employment options to the lower paying and/or more physically demanding jobs.
So, most (if not all) States have the GED program. The now older, and one hopes wiser, former students take a test. Success at the test earns them the legal, if not quite socal, equal of the high school diploma they could have had earlier.
-- modified at 18:56 Monday 6th November, 2006
|
|
|
|
|