|
sentiant wrote: ColdFusion
Is it still alive?
sentiant wrote: see are open source or M$ offerings a part of a poll
Open competition.
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: Is it still alive?
What's Cold Fusion?
Not trying to be funny here (No offense to CF developers): I literally have never run into it in 30 years of development. I guess I could Google it - maybe that's why it didn't show up in the poll, though - is it widely used?
-CB
|
|
|
|
|
That's coz ColdFusion sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
Bradml wrote: That's coz ColdFusion sucks.
You beat me to it.
|
|
|
|
|
That's what the Other box is for
"I don't want more choice. I just want better things!" - Edina Monsoon
|
|
|
|
|
Only C# is being enlisted. There are developers in VB.NET. Sometime back in General Discussions forum, there was something about COBOL right? Shouldn't .NET be a broad mention out there instead of C#?
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah i agree with you on this one. The languages are not being represented equally. It seems to me that some are not as important as the others. Some of us still use COBOL and VB.NET for that matter...
"Everyday I beat my own previous record for number of consecutive days I've stayed alive..."
|
|
|
|
|
But the question is about programming languages, not frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
True. But the point is that significant .NET languages are being sidelined?
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: significant .NET languages are being sidelined
Boo[^] ?
Failure is not an option - it's built right in.
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I can see, VB is included in the poll. Not specifying wether it is the script version (for old ASP and local scripting), version 6.0 or older, or one of the .Net-versions.
Carolina Berglund
Consultant, systemdeveloper and architect.
|
|
|
|