|
How to use the Crystal report's CssClass property.
I want to get effects from crystal report itself i.e from main report preview without using anything else like vb/vb.net/Asp.net etc..
It would be definitely a great help for me.
|
|
|
|
|
I am developing a windows application where I used lot of crystal reports.
Now I want to formet crystal reports using CssClass as crystal report object has a property named Cssclass.
I added a Css in my application and used the Css Class name in crystal report object's propertity.
But How I will get the effect of css class after running the Application that will display d crystal report?
In Asp.net we can use Link in Html Source Code.but in windows application how I could i get effect of Css class through
Crystal report??
Please let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
Server Application Unavailable
The web application you are attempting to access on this web server is currently unavailable. Please hit the "Refresh" button in your web browser to retry your request
Administrator Note: An error message detailing the cause of this specific request failure can be found in the application event log of the web server. Please review this log entry to discover what caused this error to occur.
Thanks and Regrads
From Srikanth.Y
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I've created dialog application with few controls in it and a tooltip has to be displayed for the controls when the mouse cursor rests on it.The tool tip will for few controls will change depending on the state of the application.To achieve this I subscribed for the popup event of the tooltip and called,
example:
SetToolTip(this.mybutton, amessage.ToString());
within the event handler.Whenever i click any of the controls the event is not getting generated and as a result I'm not able to set the tooltip correctly . What could be the reason ?
Any help would be appreciated .
Thanks and Regards,
Rajeev
|
|
|
|
|
Think hard. Is this somehow relevant to the survey? If not, then maybe you should post it in the appropriate forum.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't recommend it. However, if and when I program for the full framework I'm sure it will feel terrifically liberating.
Faith is a fine invention
For gentlemen who see;
But microscopes are prudent
In an emergency!
-Emily Dickinson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which is the best version (not new) of .net frame work for all machines and programming.????
~Khatri
|
|
|
|
|
There is no "best" for all situations, you need to look at your own requirements.
I don't think there is much of a case for 1.0/1.1 any more, unless you absolutely must support an existing 1.0/1.1 app and upgrading isn't an option.
If you working for mobile devices, the compact framework is the only real choice.
If you have to support windows 2000, you can't use 3.0/3.5, so 2.0 is the one to go for.
If you don't have any restrictions, I can't think of any good reason not to go for 3.5.
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
Well .net 3.5 is .net 2.0 + (WPF,WCF,WF,LINQ ...)
|
|
|
|
|
yassir hannoun wrote: Well .net 3.5 is .net 2.0 + (WPF,WCF,WF,LINQ ...)
No, you're wrong.
.NET 3.0 = .NET 2.0 + WPF + WCF + WF + Cardspace
then .NET 3.5 = .NET 3.0 + .NET 3.0 SP1 + LINQ
Eriawan
|
|
|
|
|
well .net 3.5 is an update to 3.0
|
|
|
|
|
yassir hannoun wrote: well .net 3.5 is an update to 3.0
I'm afraid it's not exactly that way.
If you say, .NET 3.5 is a new update of .NET 3.0 because of LINQ, you're correct. But it's just LINQ and Addins (in System.Addin), and not anything else.
If you look at the documentation of .NET 3.5 class libraries, it's clearly stated that enhancements in many 3.0 pillars such as WPF, for example the included support of 2D on 3D, is available on .NET 3.0 SP1.
For a nice example, read this Viewport2DVisual3D documentation on online MSDN library:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb613588.aspx[^]
It's clearly stated that it's supported on .NET 3.0 SP1 and 3.5. Which means, it's available since .NET 3.0 SP1.
The only new minor enhancements on WPF in .NET 3.5 are two: the XBAP support for Firefox and few localization languages. Nothing more.
It's true that this can cause confusions, since some classes on .NET 3.5 (not just WPF, some WCF and Workflow) are also available on .NET 3.0 SP1.
The original release .NET 3.0 SP1 can be downloaded separately. You can search it on Microsoft download page, enter ".NET 3.0 SP1" as keyword.
I hope this gives cleans explanations.
|
|
|
|
|
I thik that the best for Windows application is not using .NET. Because there is many companies that still using Win2k and don't using WUS or SUS. (I was working in company where 40% of employees using Office 97 and it's completely satisfy their needs)
For developers i think 3.5 will be better because there is many new encantments WPF,LINQ etc.
And who is you end users?
Wormhole is the God divided by zero
|
|
|
|
|
You can run .NET 2.0 on W2K.
"What's everyone so worked up about? So there's a comet -- big deal. It'll burn up in our atmosphere and what's ever left will be no bigger than a chihuahua's head." - Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
|
.NET 2.0 is still the most popular one at this moment. It is hard to say which one is the best. It depends on what functionality you are targeting.
TOMZ_KV
|
|
|
|
|
Infact 3.0 and 3.5 uses .net 2.0 CLR
It is not about whihc is the best it is about which one full filed your needs with minimum of requirement on the server.
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 used the 2.0 CLR, 3 was just add-ons. 3.5 uses it's own CLR.
"Listen, and listen well. I really like the band N-Sync. My favorite member is Harpo. I think there's a Harpo. If not there should be. I will write their next hit, maybe 'A boom-boom chiky chiky boom-boom a boom-boom chiky chaka chaka cho cho.' By the way, you must beware of Betty's iron claw. They are sharp, and they hurt. And beware his song about big butts, he beats people up while he plays it! " - Master Tang (from Kung Pow: Enter the Fist)
|
|
|
|
|
The Dogcow Farmer wrote: 3.0 used the 2.0 CLR,
This is right.
The Dogcow Farmer wrote: 3 was just add-ons. 3.5 uses it's own CLR.
This is absolutely wrong.
.NET 3.5 is sitting on top of .NET 2.0, since it only adds LINQ and System.AddIn and it contains .NET 3.0 SP1, and .NET 3.0 SP1 has .NET 2.0, and the CLR of all of these 3 releases is simply CLR 2.0.
Please read this blog entry of Microsoft's Somasegar:
http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/05/18/601354.aspx[^]
|
|
|
|
|
.Net Compact Framework comes in 1.0, 2.0 and 3.5 versions
So, assigning just one option is not fair. I think it shouldn't be included in the list and be evaluated in a separate survey.
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
At work its still 2.0, however at home 3.5 (i'm a contractor.. gotta keep the skills up )
|
|
|
|
|
I target all of them. With a gun.
So more like "aim".
|
|
|
|
|
Member 4134890 wrote: I target all of them. With a gun.
I bet they are moving too fast.
|
|
|
|
|
.NET? Moving too fast? Hell yes...
*goes back to his C++ code*
|
|
|
|