Wouldn’t it be nice if you could test whether an element is contained in an array by using a
Contains method just like the one available on
List objects? Wouldn’t it be good if you could write code like this?
string[] stuff = ....;
if (stuff.Contains("item"))
{
...
}
In .NET 3.5, this is possible out of the box (make sure you reference
System.Core and include the
System.Linq namespace) but if you try to run this code in .NET 2.0 or .NET 3.0, you will get errors. Nevertheless the .NET Framework 2.0 does provide a
Contains() method on any
Array object.
In the .NET Framework 2.0,
System.Array implements the
System.Collections.Generic.IList<T> interface. Unfortunately the implementation of the
IList interface is provided at runtime, so we do not see the methods in Visual Studio and we cannot write
array.Contains().
Instead, we have to cast the array to the appropriate
IList interface:
string[] arr = new string[] { "RR US", "RR India", "RR UK" };
if (!((IList<string>)arr).Contains("India"))
{
System.Console.WriteLine ("Correct! We are working with RR India");
}
The documentation explains it as follows:
In the .NET Framework version 2.0, the
Array class implements the
System.Collections.Generic.IList,
System.Collections.Generic.ICollection, and
System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable generic interfaces. The implementations are provided to arrays at run time, and therefore are not visible to the documentation build tools. As a result, the generic interfaces do not appear in the declaration syntax for the
Array class, and there are no reference topics for interface members that are accessible only by casting an array to the generic interface type (explicit interface implementations). The key thing to be aware of when you cast an array to one of these interfaces is that members which add, insert, or remove elements throw
NotSupportedException.
So next time, you can save yourself from writing (unnecessary) code like this:
bool found =false;
foreach (string s in array)
{
if (s.Equals("item"))
{
found =true;
break;
}
}
if (found)
{
........
}
Happy programming!!!!!
