16,021,580 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View .NET questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by Juliett Kilo (Top 4 by date)
Juliett Kilo
25-May-21 1:17am
View
"I get that digging is not your cup of tea". You are wrong: We have searched for a solution for months, and so, too, has a specialized company we employed for assistance. My question is kind of a last resort; it reads: "Does anybody know ...". I understand that you do not know it, either.
Juliett Kilo
25-May-21 1:16am
View
Deleted
"I get that digging is not your cup of tea". You are wrong: We have searched for a solution for months, and so, too, has a specialized company we employed for assistance. My question is kind of a last resort; it reads: "Does anybody know ...". I understand that you do not know it, either.
Juliett Kilo
14-May-21 1:29am
View
@Gerry Schmitz: "Easy" is not the issue. But a solution must be (1) reliable and (2) feasible with reasonable effort.
Serialization: .Text is not an option: It cannot contain e.g. the mentioned images. XML is an option, as mentioned, but .WordOpenXML doesn't work reliably. What alternatives can you suggest to serialize any whatsoever Word contents? [That's been part of my original question :-) ]
"And parse them again at run time": In XML or in the object model? The object model is not the problem. Analyzing and modifying the XML, however, is an unreasonable effort from our point of view.
By the way: I haven't got why you mentioned RTBs here. I can't see how they could help in a VSTO document-level customization.
Juliett Kilo
12-May-21 1:31am
View
@Gerry Schmitz: This does not work that "easily". Corrections are too late at the time of reloading because then I do not have the original anymore and don't know whether, e.g., I have to add a paragraph, or how else to correct the memorized contents. So the XML has to be corrected already at the time of reading the XML. Do you really want to suggest that I (1) analyze the XML returned by WordOpenXML and (2) add e.g. the missing image (example 2) myself if it is missing? I guess you can imagine that this nearly means that I would have to develop another version of Word myself ...