16,004,557 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View .NET questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by Member 1880403 (Top 10 by date)
Member 1880403
14-Dec-15 7:43am
View
Reason for my vote of 1 \n No. There are so many ways to achieve the same result without exposing the full textbox.
Member 1880403
20-Apr-15 7:34am
View
Reason for my vote of 4 \n Good work. No criticism, but just an observation based on my experience. Sometimes the schema info returned by GetSchema is not a true representation of the schema, as datatypes are often translated etc. Also anything other than MS SQL is terribly generic, if it comes back at all. To this end, if I need to programmatically get schema info, I usually do it with queries in the native SQL of the underlying database. However, sometimes that's more than you need, in which case GetSchema �s often all you need:)
Member 1880403
9-Mar-15 10:24am
View
Reason for my vote of 4 \n Cool, but you may find it doesn't always work. I've discovered in the past that whether or not onunload ever fires is dependent on the browser and its security settings.
Member 1880403
10-Oct-14 7:57am
View
Reason for my vote of 5 \n Don't let the naysayers put you off.
Member 1880403
27-Aug-14 7:24am
View
Reason for my vote of 2 \n Too basic to be a tip/trick, but good effort.
Member 1880403
9-Dec-13 8:56am
View
Sorry, but BillWoodruff is correct. By default, controls added at run time in this way are invisible. The simple one line addition needed to make your example work is to set Visible = true;
Member 1880403
4-Jun-13 4:09am
View
Well I did. And anyone else who googles for a good MSDN style document generator for VS will I guess. Anyway, sorry for clearly offending you. I appreciate that you attempted to answer the question. Please don't let me put you off. Right now, I must crack on with my work. All the best.
Member 1880403
4-Jun-13 4:04am
View
Seeing as you insist, I was attempting to stop lots of people wasting their time and building up their hopes thinking a solution had been found, when in fact it is a solution to an entirely different problem, and a minute of reading would have made that obvious.
Member 1880403
4-Jun-13 3:56am
View
No useful info at all, which I why I didn't post. Lets not further dilute this thread by bickering. There is work to be done.
Member 1880403
3-Jun-13 10:02am
View
It would have taken less than a minute more to work out that posting a link about XML documentation in code is not the same as producing MSDN style documentation that the original poster and others were asking about.
Show More