16,008,750 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View .NET questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by Ken Guru (Top 8 by date)
Ken Guru
9-Jun-21 5:58am
View
Here's the code:
ca.AxisX.LabelStyle.Format = "ddd dd.MM.yy";
As i say, nothing special. Runs flawless in Debug-Release, but is messed up in Release-Build.
Ken Guru
9-Jun-21 5:52am
View
Deleted
I expected 'Mi 09.06.21' and get 'ddd dd44273MMyy'. The format applied was "ddd dd.MM.yy".The joke is that this was running smoothly before. No updates were run.
Btw: I've updated my system environments.
Ken Guru
9-Jun-21 5:50am
View
Hi Richard D.:No, same cultures on both machines. The joke is that this was running smoothly before. No updates were run. Addition: After all, on the same machine, the debug build is different from the release build.
Ken Guru
9-Jun-21 5:49am
View
Hi Richard: I expected 'Mi 09.06.21' and get 'ddd dd44273MMyy'. The Format applied was "ddd dd.MM.yy" - nothing special. Btw: I've updated my system environments.The joke is that this was running smoothly before. No updates were run.
Ken Guru
15-Jan-20 7:31am
View
Hi,
if you delete the last } (Namespace) in your file and add it again, is the result the same?
Ken Guru
17-Dec-18 5:31am
View
I've now testet this with 1000 rounds with 10.000.000!!! elements at a time on a Core i7 8700k @5GHz.
With char[] ~ 48,67 ms
With int[] ~ 52,91 ms
Only from 200.000 elements a value above 0 ms is noticeable in the stopwatch at all.
The original solution is way too slow. 6.500 Elements are as fast as 10.000.000 with this solution.
:)
Ken Guru
17-Dec-18 5:29am
View
Deleted
I've now testet this with 1000 rounds with 10.000.000!!! elements at a time on a Core i7 8700k @5GHz.
With char[] ~ 48,67 ms
With int[] ~ 52,91 ms
Only from 200.000 elements a value above 0 ms is noticeable in the stopwatch at all.
:)
Ken Guru
12-Dec-18 9:14am
View
Got it :)
Show More