Click here to Skip to main content
16,016,746 members

Comments by Im2N00By (Top 17 by date)

Im2N00By 23-Jun-11 18:18pm View    
You understand that correctly. And you doesn't have a bad idea.

However I already made some changes. I left the console input stream only for commands and the recv simply informs the user that the data is available. Then the command can be used to work with the data.
I will rewrite the application into window later, but I'm trying to make everything as much clean as possible at the moment. And I also needed console just to test the classes. In the end: your solution might take me much more effort than creating a window. But thank you anyways for interest.
Im2N00By 21-Jun-11 15:40pm View    
I tried to avoid the window implementation, because it requires a lot of additional coding. And code gets easily messy. I think I will keep the application without control for now. Will be much harder to use (because server sometimes gets buggy), so I will have to restart application.
Im2N00By 20-Jun-11 10:31am View    
Problem solved, but thank you for interest.
Im2N00By 20-Jun-11 10:30am View    
Ahh, I should finish the book first and then I should play around. Thank you a lot, you are The King. I guess the destructor will take care of the allocated memory, or is there something else I should add ?(I don't want to risk memory leak time bomb)
Im2N00By 19-Mar-11 15:22pm View    
It's little bit more clear now. I will try it with MFC CAsyncSocket for now until I will understand it little bit better.

Thank you