16,015,756 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View .NET questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by Ytrail (Top 4 by date)
Ytrail
26-Apr-12 6:57am
View
The weird thing about it though, is I already tried that & it does not work. Why? Because the toString() method gets called by default, so calling it explicitly gives the same result (which it does because I just tested). So I'm trying to figure out why it points to a list reference because it shouldn't. It should be printing out "[]", like it did when I tested the toString() method on a regular LinkedList, but when you call it on the WordList LinkedList it prints out a reference which does not make any sense to me.
Ytrail
21-Oct-11 15:01pm
View
No problem at all with an extra few lines. I just like figuring out how to make my code as short as possible. Haha! Thanks for your help though.
Ytrail
21-Oct-11 4:54am
View
Yes, that would work but it would add additional lines I wanted to find a way around. If there is no other way to reduce the switch case statement to one liners for evaluating multiple cases, then I guess I will have to go with this or the if statement... so is this possible or I'm just stuck with this? (curious)
Ytrail
4-Oct-11 1:05am
View
Deleted
Reason for my vote of 5
Provides a good examples of how to zip & unzip files without having to rely on proprietary software. Thanks!