whats wrong with the implementation?

Question

1.86/5 (3 votes)

See more:

public class animal: dog
{
}

Posted 27-Dec-13 11:43am

Member 10491035

Updated 27-Dec-13 11:45am

Richard C Bishop

v2

Add a Solution

Comments

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 27-Dec-13 22:12pm

Nothing is really implemented. :-)
—SA

1 solution

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Richard C Bishop · Accepted Answer · 2013-12-27T11:47:00

Solution 1

It is backwards in its logic. A "dog" should inherit from a more general class such as "animal", not the other way around. However, there is not anything inherently wrong with that, other than it is not complete and we are not sure if the "dog" class that animal is inheriting even exists.

Posted 27-Dec-13 11:47am

Richard C Bishop

Comments

Member 10491035 27-Dec-13 18:37pm

Thank you so much. I understood that clearly now

Richard C Bishop 30-Dec-13 10:01am

You are welcome, come back anytime.

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 27-Dec-13 22:12pm

Correct, a 5. If you did not continue your explanation with "however", it would be really bad question, because we need to abstract out the semantics.
—SA

Richard C Bishop 30-Dec-13 10:01am

Thank you Sergey!

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 30-Dec-13 11:43am

Sure. Happy New Year!
—SA