|
I see it now. Its not on any of the menu's though. Its also empty. I guess there aren't a lot of CP ers interested in games. I might write the first article for it. It might spark a bit of interest.
Jon
|
|
|
|
|
It's under the Platforms and SDKs section.
I've just had a play about with the XNA SDK, so I can't say that I would provide anything of value for other developers but the forum does interest me. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to push my knowledge along in games development - too much to do, and far too little time to do it in.
|
|
|
|
|
I was about to post the same thing about an XNA forum - good job i checked here first or people may have been throwing 1's at me
Dan
|
|
|
|
|
Hi!
I recently started a project in DotNetNuke and found really hard to get help regarding DotNetNuke issues, the forums available on their site (dotnetnuke.com) seems not much helpfull as compared to CP, may be because they are moderated and i have to wait for long time to get answers of my questions. I was wondering if CP starts a new Message Board on DotNetNuke then it will be really helpfull...just a thought!
Regards,
Affan Ahmad Toor
..................
QUAIDIAN FOR ONCE, QUAIDIAN FOR EVER!
|
|
|
|
|
If you have a message board for DotNetNuke, then shouldn't you have a message board for Kentico, and how about SharpDevelop? The problem with this is that there are a huge amount of systems that you could end up having in the forums.
|
|
|
|
|
hhhummmm! i think you are rite...but how about a Message Board which is not specific to any such framework/system but covers all of them...like if any one have questions on DotNetNuke or Kentico or SharpDevelop or any other such system/frameworks he/she will refer to that group...?
I think this will help a lot of developers working on such systems/frameworks.
Regards,
Affan Ahmad Toor
..................
QUAIDIAN FOR ONCE, QUAIDIAN FOR EVER!
|
|
|
|
|
You can however make use of the generic ASP.NET/Javascript messageboard gems in CodeProject right? The only thing that matters is how best you represent your query to your peers and that dictates and stipulates how fast and effectively you get a response from them.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if this is a suggestion, or an idiot user not knowing where to look; Is there an easy way to view all of your posts on the forums, and if not could we have a My Posts linky up in the top right?
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at your profile and you will find link there
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent
(But can we also have a linky up in the top right, since the functionality already exists?)
|
|
|
|
|
Sometime back, I remember seeing in CodeProject MessageBoard that 'Expanded View' was applicable for Supporters only, if I am right. Isn't it? Now I feel that is available to all?
|
|
|
|
|
I've been going through a few video tutorials lately for work & it occured to me this morning that perhaps we could have video tutorials to go along with some of the articles (either as supplements or individual submissions).
I find it easier to absorb information from a video tutorial than from an article and I'm fairly sure I'm not the only one. Working through a video tutorial is faster too. Seeing that we have alot of great articles and authors here maybe a few of them would like to put their skills to the test as producers as well?
I scouted around the site briefly looking for something like this & found nothing. Does this already exist? Is it worth thinking about?
I think I'm going to call my next project "Chuck Norris". It's a sure way to guarantee it's unbreakable.
• • •
But fortunately we have the nanny-state politicians who can step in to protect us poor stupid consumers, most of whom would not know a JVM from a frozen chicken. Bruce Pierson
|
|
|
|
|
Good one. But Video hosting needs to be taken in after considering a lot of factors like. Significant points may include:
(*) Copyrighted content
(*) Bandwidth usage
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: (*) Copyrighted content
(*) Bandwidth usage
I suppose anything with a copyright wouldn't be put up anyway unless it was accompanied by express permission. Would it fall in the editors lap to check for copyright infringement? Or better - leave it to the users to report copyrighted material. I stand under correction but it would still follow the same kind of "submission model" used for articles.
Agreed, bandwidth width & storage for video content is significantly greater than that of text articles. Perhaps a size limit could be imposed on uploads? This may lead to some really low res, iccy submissions which wouldn't be cool.
Whack in a few extra big harddrives maybe? Stick them in miscellaneious Gmail accounts? Over 2871.9755xxxx mb & counting
I think I'm going to call my next project "Chuck Norris". It's a sure way to guarantee it's unbreakable.
• • •
But fortunately we have the nanny-state politicians who can step in to protect us poor stupid consumers, most of whom would not know a JVM from a frozen chicken. Bruce Pierson
|
|
|
|
|
Rather than email attachments in GMail drive, I would say Google Video or YouTube would be a better deal to strike.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is this a bug report or a suggestion?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
This text is to indicate an example in the javascript. Isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
When you view an article published in CodeProject and want to see the profile of the author, you click on his name beneath the Article caption. But this is navigating to the list of articles published by him and again, I have to scroll down in the page to view his Online Profile.
The specified link itself can be made to hyperlink to his Online Profile. Isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
This is by design
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
But then, a direct link to UserProfile page can also be facilitated. Isn't it? That would enhance the user experience greatly.
|
|
|
|
|
Can we have an XNA category added? I am planning on submitting some XNA articles. They would apply to both C#, Windows and XBox-360.
If there is one already (and I am just missing it) let me know!
Thanks,
Bob Bradley
|
|
|
|
|
|
While I agree that articles specific to the XBox-360 platform might come under hardware, I think that XNA still deserves its own category. XNA is a set of software tools that make developing games and multimedia applications a lot easier. XNA is build on top of the .NET 2.0 Framework, but it includes its own environment and additional libraries. Currently only C# is officialy supported by XNA, but technically any .NET language should be able to work under it. The neat part is that programs written to XNA can be compiled to run under both Windows and XBox-360.
|
|
|
|
|