|
Nishant S wrote:
It's intended behaviour for any browser
Nope, here is the offending piece of script.
<script language="JavaScript" for="window" event="onload">
<!--
document.MessageForm.Subject.focus();
</script>
I've never really noticed it on CP, but it always pisses me off when sites force focus onto a control when a page is done loading, because I might just have been busy reading something in another window. 
Same with any application really, what gives another app the right to sieze focus.
Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
You don't need eyes to see, you need vision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The question of the day would be more enjoyable for me if I could answer and get the answer immediatly. Probably save the responses and give prizes to the top scores. I don't know... just a thought.
Eddie Velasquez: A Squeezed Devil
Checkout General Guidelines for C# Class Implementation
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe making it into a Poll would be a good idea, with the correct answer highlighted. Then we'd be able to see how many people are getting it wrong
--
Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
|
|
|
|
|
this one  should have a different tag.
Look a little funny when people are posting questions
with a class dtor.
class::~class()
And while im at it, it would be nice if
you just could select something in the forums dropdown
combo and end up there without having to press the go button.
And the go button....should be a pixel or 2 wider.. 
/Magnus
|
|
|
|
|
Magnus H wrote:
And while im at it, it would be nice if
you just could select something in the forums dropdown
combo and end up there without having to press the go button.
And the go button....should be a pixel or 2 wider..
If you could only see the expression on my face at the moment... 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
Rub your belly and pat your head simultaneously. Sometimes that helps me make sense of things - Jon Sagara
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
And the go button....should be a pixel or 2 wider..
If you could only see the expression on my face at the moment...
It's not important what it does, the only thing that matters
is how it looks.
Applies to everything.....cars, women, MS software...
/Magnus
|
|
|
|
|
I'm picturing it now... [suppressing giggle, failing badly, laughing and snorting suppressor fails completely]
sorry.
I Drowned Schroedinger's Stupid Cat!
|
|
|
|
|
Informal Poll for another daft suggestion !
How many CPians would like/use
Bob Leather Jackets ?
Similar to the bomber crew ones.
Regardz
Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
More about me
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like one... but then again it does depend on the price as well
"When a friend hurts us, we should write it down in the sand, where the winds of forgiveness get in charge of erasing it away, and when something great happens, we should engrave it in the stone of the memory of the heart, where no wind can erase it" Nish on life [methinks]
"It's The Soapbox; topics are optional" Shog 9
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. I would just like some clothes!  
Roger Allen
Sonork 100.10016
If I had a quote, it would be a very good one.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I think CP should launch a whole apparel line.
Some of us need to get dressed.
Actually a Cap with a stuffed toy version of Bob on it would be a hit with the kidz.
Regardz
Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
More about me
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Allen wrote:
I would just like some clothes!
This isn't a pretty image... Maybe we should take up a collection or something
I Drowned Schroedinger's Stupid Cat!
|
|
|
|
|
All new members with feminine names should be required to submit signed medical records attesting that they are indeed female. The same goes for names which are gender-neutral (i.e. Pat, Francis, Cecil), or are given a feminine appearance (Richard).
--------
The real problem is that you don't have to be religious to be a religious fanatic,
you just have to be a fanatic. -- Stan Shannon, the lounge
|
|
|
|
|
Amen.
Of course that still won't be good enough for *some* people. They'll want naked photos of their private area, just to be absolutely sure. Then again *some* people might happily oblige.
But hey. Let's keep this a family site.
Why not throw away a dime?
I throw away ten pennies all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
kevnar wrote:
They'll want naked photos of their private area, just to be absolutely sure
Yeah, coz those sort of photos are SO hard to find on the net....
Christian
I am completely intolerant of stupidity. Stupidity is, of course, anything that doesn't conform to my way of thinking. - Jamie Hale - 29/05/2002
Half the reason people switch away from VB is to find out what actually goes on.. and then like me they find out that they weren't quite as good as they thought - they've been nannied. - Alex, 13 June 2002
|
|
|
|
|
C'mon Shog9 the real problem isn't female CPians or males posing as females. But the problem is the sexually frustated males who make a big thing about it due to ther own inadequacies.
I purposely don't reply to new females on the forums since I notice that when they make any statement at all they get unlimitted responses.
Consequently I'm on friendly terms with a couple of female CPians as you well know also. { And thats as far as it goes }.
I know one female and I suspect there are other females who pose as males because of this.
You are trying to treat the symptom and not the cause.
Regardz
Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
More about me
|
|
|
|
|
I was *trying* to be absurdly facetious, to illustrate the absurdity of trying to prove sex in a place such as this... I should know better by now i guess
... But you've made some good points! It's sad that women would feel they had pretend to be men in order to co-exist here... 
--------
The real problem is that you don't have to be religious to be a religious fanatic,
you just have to be a fanatic. -- Stan Shannon, the lounge
|
|
|
|
|
By now, don't you realise that I'm never serious about anything at all that I post ?
Even this ?
Regardz
Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
More about me
|
|
|
|
|
Colin Davies wrote:
Even this ?
Oh, you just *had* to qualify it. Now i'll still be guessing...
--------
The real problem is that you don't have to be religious to be a religious fanatic,
you just have to be a fanatic. -- Stan Shannon, the lounge
|
|
|
|
|
Well I thought it would make my post look interrogatively rhetorical.
Or did I ?
Regardz
Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
More about me
|
|
|
|
|
Colin Davies wrote:
Or did I ?
i suspect you thought it would cap the thread... But i've been known to be wrong in such matters
--------
The real problem is that you don't have to be religious to be a religious fanatic,
you just have to be a fanatic. -- Stan Shannon, the lounge
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough, since you insist I'll have the last word
Regardz
Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
More about me
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
