|
Chris Maunder wrote:
This is just an experiment at the moment
The expanded view looks cool Chris.. ok.. where do I sign up as a suporter??? 
"When a friend hurts us, we should write it down in the sand, where the winds of forgiveness get in charge of erasing it away, and when something great happens, we should engrave it in the stone of the memory of the heart, where no wind can erase it" Nish on life [methinks]
"It's The Soapbox; topics are optional" Shog 9
|
|
|
|
|
Too bad sub editors don't get that. I think you guys need to file an anti-discriminatory suit.
I have never wasted time worrying about such insignificant things. Keep your eye upon the donut and NOT upon the hole. - Bill Sergio about posting in the right forum. The Lounge - June 23, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
Rama Krishna wrote:
Too bad sub editors don't get that
Yep... I'm a full editor now [my evil plan is working......]
Rama Krishna wrote:
I think you guys need to file a anti-discriminatory suit.
know any good lawyers?
"When a friend hurts us, we should write it down in the sand, where the winds of forgiveness get in charge of erasing it away, and when something great happens, we should engrave it in the stone of the memory of the heart, where no wind can erase it" Nish on life [methinks]
"It's The Soapbox; topics are optional" Shog 9
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
I might make a hybrid version for the 'thread view' option to see if that's more useable.
I would like to see the thread view load the first post of each thread when it originally loads. That way a click on the thread will show the contents of the first post (the same way a click in DHTML view does), and then we could decide if we want to spend the time to download the whole thread. This is especially true for those of us with slow connections, who when we connect find up to a 1000 unread posts in the lounge, and not all the titles are very desciptive of what the thread is about. I just find it a pain to spend the time downloading the entire thread only to find the topic uninteresting, or skipping over what turned out to an interesting thread because the caption seemed uninteresting.
I hope that made sense
---
CPUA 0x5041
Sonork 100.11743 Chicken Little
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
Why is feature supporters only?
Best regards,
Alexandru Savescu
|
|
|
|
|
...so when I get to the New Thread screen I start typing. When the page finishes downloading it sets the cursor back to the subject box so I have to delete what I've accidentally typed in the subject box and get back to where I was typing. It's very minor, buts it's kind of an annoyance.
-Raffi
Yet another example of my bad programming skills.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Raffi
I don't think Chris can do anything about that. It's intended behaviour for any browser, I'd say. A solution would to be type your post into notepad and then copy/paste. That's what most of us do, anyway 
Nish
Author of the romantic comedy
Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win]
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant S wrote:
solution would to be type your post into notepad and then copy/paste. That's what most of us do, anyway
Serious? Notepad? Wow...
--------
The real problem is that you don't have to be religious to be a religious fanatic,
you just have to be a fanatic. -- Stan Shannon, the lounge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant S wrote:
Just what's so surprising about that, huh???
You've really optimized the process, i guess!
--------
The real problem is that you don't have to be religious to be a religious fanatic,
you just have to be a fanatic. -- Stan Shannon, the lounge
|
|
|
|
|
what's so surprising about that
I'd have thought you'd use the old command line debug program and type your bytes in directly. Now I'm disillusioned.
|
|
|
|
|
All my major text inputs are done in notepad as well.
There is nothing worse than spending a few minutes on a rant or reply and then CP won't process the post.
I've been burnt too often to go through that all the time.
Regardz
Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
More about me
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant S wrote:
It's intended behaviour for any browser
Nope, here is the offending piece of script.
<script language="JavaScript" for="window" event="onload">
<!--
document.MessageForm.Subject.focus();
</script>
I've never really noticed it on CP, but it always pisses me off when sites force focus onto a control when a page is done loading, because I might just have been busy reading something in another window. 
Same with any application really, what gives another app the right to sieze focus.
Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
You don't need eyes to see, you need vision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The question of the day would be more enjoyable for me if I could answer and get the answer immediatly. Probably save the responses and give prizes to the top scores. I don't know... just a thought.
Eddie Velasquez: A Squeezed Devil
Checkout General Guidelines for C# Class Implementation
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe making it into a Poll would be a good idea, with the correct answer highlighted. Then we'd be able to see how many people are getting it wrong
--
Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
|
|
|
|
|
this one should have a different tag.
Look a little funny when people are posting questions
with a class dtor.
class::~class()
And while im at it, it would be nice if
you just could select something in the forums dropdown
combo and end up there without having to press the go button.
And the go button....should be a pixel or 2 wider..
/Magnus
|
|
|
|
|
Magnus H wrote:
And while im at it, it would be nice if
you just could select something in the forums dropdown
combo and end up there without having to press the go button.
And the go button....should be a pixel or 2 wider..
If you could only see the expression on my face at the moment... 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
Rub your belly and pat your head simultaneously. Sometimes that helps me make sense of things - Jon Sagara
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
And the go button....should be a pixel or 2 wider..
If you could only see the expression on my face at the moment...
It's not important what it does, the only thing that matters
is how it looks.
Applies to everything.....cars, women, MS software...
/Magnus
|
|
|
|
|
I'm picturing it now... [suppressing giggle, failing badly, laughing and snorting suppressor fails completely]
sorry.
I Drowned Schroedinger's Stupid Cat!
|
|
|
|
|
Informal Poll for another daft suggestion !
How many CPians would like/use
Bob Leather Jackets ?
Similar to the bomber crew ones.
Regardz
Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
More about me
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like one... but then again it does depend on the price as well
"When a friend hurts us, we should write it down in the sand, where the winds of forgiveness get in charge of erasing it away, and when something great happens, we should engrave it in the stone of the memory of the heart, where no wind can erase it" Nish on life [methinks]
"It's The Soapbox; topics are optional" Shog 9
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. I would just like some clothes!  
Roger Allen
Sonork 100.10016
If I had a quote, it would be a very good one.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
