|
Hi,
I like to find articles base upon the DotNet Version. So if I want DotNet 3.5 articles, I can check '3.5' by the search box.
This would cut down on time spent looking for things.
Robert
|
|
|
|
|
This is a good idea, but it shouldn't necessarily be limited to just versions of .NET as it can also apply to versions of MFC and C++.
|
|
|
|
|
This has been implemented in the rewrite
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Windows XP Pro Firefox 2.0.0.7
|
|
|
|
|
Heh I always like that one.
Every time I see it I'm tempted to bring it up, but if I wasn't using CPHog,
the ad bar wouldn't be on the right.
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Salsbery wrote: but if I wasn't using CPHog
Oh, I didn't know it was doing that. I didn't read the documentation!
which way did the little fishies gooooo
|
|
|
|
|
The dropdown menu still should be on top I would think.
Maybe it's never come up since the left menus don't drop down.
Or maybe it's by design. *shrug*
Cheers
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
Using CPHog?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
*snicker*
---- ...the wind blows over it and it is gone, and its place remembers it no more...
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Using CPHog?
Yep, didn't know that was moving it to the right side or I wouldn't have posted this. My bad.
|
|
|
|
|
What happened? It's on top now? Did you make a change to account for CPHog?
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. The problem only occurs for Flash banners since they are hosted in an ActiveX control (and it's the control that screws up the z-order)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ouch that's embarrassing. I guess a little spy++ would have told me that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Google found me a link to a post on that page, so now I can at least look at the article.
|
|
|
|
|
I have fixed it, check it now.
Sorry for the inconvenience,
Sean
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Sean! for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like someone took it down with malformed HTML in a post again.
--
If you view money as inherently evil, I view it as my duty to assist in making you more virtuous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many unedited articles aren't formatted correctly - large images, code that isn't wrapped etc. As soon as an editor gets a chance to edit it will be fixed.
The best thing you can do is use the "Report Article" link at the top of the article to let us know there's one that needs urgent attention.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: one that needs urgent attention.
Oh my Bob, he used that word. "Bailiff! wack his pee-pee!"
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: "Bailiff! wack his pee-pee!"
Not heard that before - a funny end to what has been a pretty naff day!!
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|
|
When someone reads an article it would be nice to have a list of other related articles from the same topic.
-------------
commander
|
|
|
|
|
We already have something close to this at the bottom of articles but are working to tighten it up and make the article list much closer to the current article
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Most probably mentioned before, but if somebody asks a nobby question (read NIIT in C# forum, or similar), and they get 'suitable' replies, they delete their original question. This a) screws up the boards by having dangling posts, and b) gives the OP anonymity from his stupid question / interview question / homework question, which he may have had an answer too, and he can 't be caught 'cheating'.
I always think twice before asking a question or even ansewring, as I know my current boss frequents the boards, and any future boss could well have a look.
So - without the waffle, can we stop questions that have had a reply from being deleted?
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|