|
ok thats wonderful
Cheers...
Rocky
You can't climb up a ladder with your hands in your pockets.
|
|
|
|
|
I know there are already a few out there but the ones I've seen only have a few members, all in favour say aye!
There are 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who dont --- I dunno who
|
|
|
|
|
Nay.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: Nay.
Why
There are 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who dont.
|
|
|
|
|
smyers wrote: Why
Two reasons:
1. It was a joke icon.
2. Forums should only be added if there is enough popular demand.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: 1. It was a joke icon.
I saw that
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: 2. Forums should only be added if there is enough popular demand.
There will never be enough popular demand if everybody jokes and replies nay. I think a Sharepoint forum is a good idea.
There are 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who dont.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: Forums should only be added if there is enough popular demand.
In that case, I feel CP should put up a Forum Request Poll and keep adding the topics that are being requested. I feel the most common topics that are being requested are:
1) Sharepoint
2) Silverlight
3) Php (Non Microsoft)
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: Php (Non Microsoft)
That's only bradml and his many aliases.;)
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
I reckon a forum on Women / Wives. Never been able to understand mine, even after 18 years, and need considerable help at times.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: Nay
Well said. The first priority should be to have a Sonia Gupta forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: The first priority should be to have a Sonia Gupta forum.
Too bloody right it should.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
Currently the use of images as custom bullets in lists in articles is disallowed in global.css. Would you re-consider this for UL lists? As an example, here is a list of 3 items, once with custom bullets, the second time with standard bullets: [^]
I believe this would be helpful in the visual presentation of articles - for example, use of red, yellow, green bullets to indicate different states, levels, etc.
Of course, this could also be accomplished with TABLEs, but using UL is a lot more concise and maintainable. The html would look like:
<ul style="list-style-image: url('MyArticle/blueball.gif')">
-- modified at 6:37 Monday 5th November, 2007
I have updated my XHtmlTree article[^] to show what these image bullets look like in an actual article.
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't people be able to abuse that to post images though?
My current favourite word is: Waffle
Cheese is still good though.
|
|
|
|
|
As I said, the same thing could also be accomplished by inserting images in TABLEs, so there are other ways to "abuse" posting images that cannot be prevented. The only thing that disallowing images in ULs does is to prevent legitimate use of images.
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent suggestion, Hans
|
|
|
|
|
|
Got it fixed... A SPAN tag found it's way in somehow, which tweaked a font.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Walton wrote: Got it fixed...
Cool. Went to your article and didn't see it until I saw you fixed it. Very nice article, btw.
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
White Streaks and Rabbit Threads? Sounds like the name of a band that CG would enjoy.
|
|
|
|
|
Zebra Threads then?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this months tips:
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
I just posted an article: http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/ExtensionManagerLibrary.asp
And for the life of me I cannot get my code to highlight in anything but the default c++.
I'm using
I should note that the html editor always formats it as <pre lang="cs">.
What's going on here? I've used the highlighter in the past the same way and had no problems!
|
|
|
|
|
The highlighter is busted. We have a new one on the way.
Sorry about this
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Good to know! Will it automatically highlight in my article when it's fixed?
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Doh, that came out wrong... Should read:
I'm using:
<pre lang=cs >
I should note that the html editor always formats it as:
<pre lang="cs" >
What's going on here? I've used the highlighter in the past the same way and had no problems!
|
|
|
|