|
Brian Delahunty wrote:
Think it might be a good idea if you could set different noise filter levels for different forums.
Yeah, that would be cool.
Shog9
------
Living in Australia, it's the next best thing to being in the Middle East - Taka Muraoka, Clickety..., 10/30/02
|
|
|
|
|
9000 forums, 52,000 users. Storing settings for each user for each forum would be fantastic, but the overhead it would cause isn't worth the benefit at the moment. When I can convince Compaq or someone to donate a 4-head 2GHz, 4Gb Xeon to a good cause (ie me) then I'll do it 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
9000 forums, 52,000 users.
Oh yeah!!!
Chris Maunder wrote:
When I can convince Compaq or someone to donate a 4-head 2GHz, 4Gb Xeon to a good cause (ie me) then I'll do it
Cool. Not be happening in the near future then??? 
Would be nice to get them to donate one... Just tell them you'll slap an advert on teh front page for a year. That'll convince them.
Regards,
Brian Dela 
|
|
|
|
|
compression?
or only record the forums that people set it for - so for example i use 4/5 forums and i guess thats pretty average - so the worst would be
3 bits (max five levels) + forum id [16 bits]: call it 20bits for luck
* 5 forums (average - ob. some user will have less, some more, but always way less than 9000)
* 52,000 users
= 5200,000 bits
which is not much space at all....
of course this relies on using a packed representation
"When the only tool you have is a hammer, a sore thumb you will have."
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing worse than giving a flippant excuse to try and dodge work only to have someone point out the obvious piece of the puzzle you were trying to hide
The issue isn't only the size of the data, it's the number of rows involved and the time taken to do the extra lookup.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Can't this be done with cookies ?
Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
I can levitate birds...
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
9000 forums
hmmm, you could consider the forums for the articles all with the same setting, and just have different ones for the forums listed on the message boards page, i calculate that to be 21 - only a little under 9000
1001111111011101111100111100101011110011110100101110010011010010
Sonork | 100.21142 | TheEclypse
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
When I can convince Compaq or someone to donate a 4-head 2GHz, 4Gb Xeon to a good cause (ie me)
Is there a petition I can sign somewhere?
"When in danger, fear, or doubt, run in circles, scream and shout!" - Lorelei and Lapis Lazuli Long
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Delahunty wrote:
Just noticed that once you set the noise level it's the same on all the forums [I presume it's saved through the use of cookies?].
Odd that, I swear (and even posted) that this did happen when the voting first started.
I must be getting old... damend oldtimers disease.
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa
Ray Cassick wrote:
Well I am not female, not gay and I am not Paul Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Watson wrote:
damend oldtimers disease.
It is damn annoying, isn't it.
Regards,
Brian Dela
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Delahunty wrote:
It is damn annoying, isn't it.
What's annoying? Keh? Eh? What's that sonny?
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa
Ray Cassick wrote:
Well I am not female, not gay and I am not Paul Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Watson wrote:
What's annoying? Keh? Eh? What's that sonny?
LOL.. 
Regards,
Brian Dela
|
|
|
|
|
I like the concept of rating posts and filtering on the ratings.
But I think the presentation should be different for filtered out posts. It looks just like someone has deleted the post - especially when the posts below in that thread are visible.
Perhaps one should make all posts under an underated "node" hidden? The underated post heading should also be listed, but perhaps with a different color. This could potentially save a couple of CPU cycles/network traffic if the tree below the underated node is large. Thus you'd get some CPU cycles/network traffic back in return.
Just my 2 öre.
--
Master, I'm so glad to feel your presence. But you don't seem to share my impatience. I relied upon you to break the silence. I cannot understand your reluctance.
Master, I feel so warm and I'm so happy, oh master.
Give me some more of the warm little beasts
I'm so fond of.
|
|
|
|
|
Does the latest revision suit you?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Works like a charm.
--
Master, I'm so glad to feel your presence. But you don't seem to share my impatience. I relied upon you to break the silence. I cannot understand your reluctance.
Master, I feel so warm and I'm so happy, oh master.
Give me some more of the warm little beasts
I'm so fond of.
|
|
|
|
|
The "VS.NET IDE Issues" forum is not appering in the forum combobox at the lounge page... maybe thats why most of the answers are not answered
Mauricio Ritter - Brazil
Sonorking now: 100.13560 MRitter
![Jig | [Dance]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif) I've gone sending to outer space, to find another race
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
PHP is new upcoming technology, with a wide number of webservers/application servers being supported. I think, as PHP.NET is developing PHP 5 (that might come out in somewhere around 2003), even its code might compile to MSIL and would be a future .NET language).
Perhaps CodeProject could consider creating one forum for discussions on PHP topics too.
Deepak Kumar Vasudevan
|
|
|
|
|
vdeepakkumar wrote:
even its code might compile to MSIL and would be a future .NET language).
I seriously doubt that. Do you have any credible references?
Besides, we're really more of the Microsoft inclination. I don't think PHP really has a place here.
You will now find yourself in a wonderous, magical place, filled with talking gnomes, mythical squirrels, and, almost as an afterthought, your bookmarks
-Shog9 teaching Mel Feik how to bookmark
|
|
|
|
|
Hi David,
I think PHP at its current version release does not have a MSIL compiler or a JITer. Perhaps the following URL from the PHP Conference site should throw some light on this issue:
http://www.php-conference.de/2002/session-phpext.php
>>>Quoted from the Above URL -- Start
Ramesh Mani (Freelancer)
Interfacing PHP with ASP.NET with .NET SDK (Language: )
This session will be about outputting .MSIL from PHP which can in turn be executed using the Microsoft .NET runtime engine. With the release of PHP alpha version 4.3.0 with Zend Engine 2.0 it is possible to generate Java bytecode as well as .NET bytecode. The .NET bytecode can be serialized to disk or can be generated in-memory. We will discuss the architecture of PHP.NET as the proposed extension is called, the C/C++ code used to build the extension and the internals of the PHP module engine that outputs the .NET MSIL. We will also present a sample application which will use PHP.NET to generate presentation and processing layer logic and interface with any ASP.NET application. We will also present an example of a C# application that interfaces with the PHP.NET module.
<<
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the info. A friend and I were discussing this the other day and I said that there might eventually be a PHP.NET and he was very skeptical. He uses PHP and said that it wouldn't be well suited for .NET. Ha! Now I have one more thing to rub in his face! Ha!
You will now find yourself in a wonderous, magical place, filled with talking gnomes, mythical squirrels, and, almost as an afterthought, your bookmarks
-Shog9 teaching Mel Feik how to bookmark
|
|
|
|
|
There is PERL.NET so there's no reason why there won't be PHP.NET (especially since .NET has been ported to FreeBSD)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
David Stone wrote:
Thanks for the info. A friend and I were discussing this the other day and I said that there might eventually be a PHP.NET and he was very skeptical. He uses PHP and said that it wouldn't be well suited for .NET. Ha! Now I have one more thing to rub in his face! Ha!
If you are refering to me, you are quite incorrect, you said i should go and make php.net, and I said 'how the hell can i do that.'. none of that not suited rubbish 
so you cant rub it in my face, so it must be another firsed your refering to.
1001111111011101111100111100101011110011110100101110010011010010
Sonork | 100.21142 | TheEclypse
|
|
|
|
|
PHP's a damn fine system, but there are already several fine message boards dedicated to it (as i recall; it's been a bit). I'd suggest for the time being you post PHP-related questions in the Web Dev forum; if there becomes a lot of them i'm sure it will be easier to argue for the creation of a PHP-specific forum.
Shog9
------
So they took me down to the gallows
And this boy, he said to me:
"Why do you smile, when the rope's around your neck?"
I said, "I tell you boy, when i get back..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if this has been suggested before but I would appreciate a Code Critique section.
A lot of photography sites have it. Basically you post your photo and offer it up for constructive critique. Other people then suggest improvements, tips and tricks etc.
CP is great for learning the how and what, but can be a bit lacking on the why side. To me a CC section would be valuable for the why side. e.g. Why and when an Engine Collection Class is suitable and not.
I am not sure if a forum would be the best way to present this, but it could be a start.
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa
Ray Cassick wrote:
Well I am not female, not gay and I am not Paul Watson
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
