|
That's my profile which is deactivated.
How??? I don't know.
Chris, Please help me on the issue
|
|
|
|
|
It seems your account was banned due to there being some, shall we say, suspicious activity being carried out from that account.
I'll reactivate it, but please ensure you mainain control of your account at all time and abide by our Terms of Use[^].
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris, i have mailed the details to webmaster@codeproject.com, please reactivate my id.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris, i have no response regarding status of my id.
Please help
|
|
|
|
|
Currently the reputation graph doesn't extend lines to the end of the graph. For example, I've only publish one article, quite a while ago, so I've got a single dot on the reputation graph, and nothing more. To me it would make more sense to have a line at the level of that dot extended to the edge of the graph, as that reputation has remained constant over the rest of the time.
Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah that doesn't look. Thanks for the report. We'll look into it.
|
|
|
|
|
my editor reputation, which has been at 56[^] recently, has disappeared[^] although the FAQ[^] seems to tell me it can only increase. Not that it matters much, but it might indicate something is wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
We have been adding back some missed edit events from historical data and so edit history has been turned off, a new slide rule obtained, and results updated.
All good now (for you - still have to run the update on everyone else)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
My rep points on the graph and Quick Answers did not match (at first I thought it was supposed to work that way and I had to check the FAQ). This explains it.
There are only 10 types of people in this world — those who understand binary, and those who don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
Or is there a place where I can create new tags?
Best wishes,
Navaneeth
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think the homework cheaters would actually bother to use it? Or should be be able to flag it after the fact?
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
|
|
|
|
|
Users won't very probably use it, but people that can "Improve" could do it (saving time for other users).
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That would be neat if other users could tag questions as "homework question" and so on, then we could use the custom view to filter out questions with those tags. Perhaps only allow silver members and above to use certain tags.
|
|
|
|
|
Improve question is already only allowed for certain members (up to a grade of reputation). And that allow the improver to change subject, content, tag... So just adding the homework tag would be enough, the rest is already working.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Also, the ability to filter away questions based on tag is not yet a feature... as far as I know, you can only show questions based on their tags (rather than hide them based on their tags). For example, it would be neat to say:
Show me all questions with any of these tags:
C#
WPF
SQL
But exclude any questions that also contain any of these tags:
Homework Question
Work Request
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, sorry I didn't understand your point. You are right, that is not done yet.
I thought you was meaning the ability to change the question tag from one to another.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In the works
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Craig wrote: Or should be be able to flag it after the fact?
That's a whole other ball of wax. Although, other sites, like AllExperts.com, do allow people to categorize and reject questions according to various options (not really a question, homework question, etc.). That might be a useful feature. It would at least inform the user of why nobody is answering their question.
|
|
|
|
|
In the forums I hang out in regularly, the homework seekers are told why their question isn't going to be answered.
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
|
|
|
|
|
It would probably be useful to tell them once why their question isn't going to be answered, tagging it as "homework question", then allowing the regulars here to filter out those questions so they don't all have to see them.
|
|
|
|
|
aspdotnetdev wrote: It would probably be useful to tell them once why their question isn't going to be answered
If only they'd get the hint after being slammed with it once....
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if they keep asking questions like that and they keep going unanswered, I imagine they'll eventually give up.
|
|
|
|
|
We'll allow new tags to be created soon.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
N a v a n e e t h wrote: Can we have home-work tag for QA?
Ditto.
Luckily I read your post title before doing my own (and being flamed... ).
I would ask for a 'gimme-codez' tag too.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|