|
Featured article[^]
"Not really an article...".
Right.Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: "Not really an article...".
Definitely not a featured one...Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely not.
Strange though ...Not just published as an article... even edited too!
|
|
|
|
|
I guess these is Random selection.
|
|
|
|
|
The "featured article" is merely a randomly selected article. Maybe they should apply an extra filter that prevents everything with a rating lower than 4.0 from being "featured"..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
It's set as 4.1 minimum.
That particular article has been voted for since it was chosen, knocking it down below the threshold. We have a note to nuke featured articles if they are knocked below the threshold and quickly replace it with a new one.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hey moderators,
While looking at the Question & Answers section today, I found that user Sakshi_11[^] is just playing around posting questions from other forums (exactly the same sentences), nor does those sound like an issue that suits the user.
Kindly look into it.
Proof example:
Caught user having fun with this Question[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! That looks really odd.
The question was posted in the year 2008 on experts exchange. I wonder what the OP gets by copy pasting the query here.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: I wonder what the OP gets
a reputation.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
|
|
|
|
|
A ban, may be?
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure this is actually causing anyone, including our site, any particular stress. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ok. Just in case, wanted to inform and bring it to moderators!
thought might be a start to a spam not needed...
|
|
|
|
|
In this week Survey Results page here
It says: Survey period: 1 Feb 2010 to 8 Mar 2010
And it should be: 1 Mar 2010 to 8 Mar 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed, but technically not a bug, nor an issue with the results.
Just a ham-fisted entry operator (ie me)cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Your operator should pay attention more often. Next time fire your operator
|
|
|
|
|
I had a word with him. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Are you talking to the mirror again
|
|
|
|
|
MPD[^] means never having to be alone. 3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
No it doesn't Yesitdoes shhhh. Quiet, all of you.
Anyway, it isn't like that at all. Sure it is.
The people affected by this have a serious disease and need help. whiners
They can't control the situation and it is often terrifying for them. don't tell them that.
|
|
|
|
|
Are there plans to allow for a proper brief description, like articles have? If not, I'd like to see that feature added..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
The issue is getting people to fill them in.
Tips and Tricks are meant to be quick little tid bits. If they need a full description, above and beyond the title, then they start to wander over into the realm of article.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if they don't fill them in, then the tip/trick shouldn't show anything (as far as the description is concerned). Right now, we get what looks like the first 255 characters of the text of the tip/trick, and it kinda looks raggedy..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: it kinda looks raggedy
an opportunity for someone to earn some editor points. Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
|
|
|
|
|
Except that you can't edit the abstract.
John's right - we'll have to fix this.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|