|
Yes - I already psoted that some time ago... 
|
|
|
|
|
Appears to be nobody cares, because typo is still there.
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
No, we care a lot.
But we care more about fully testing our next release in which this typo fix is included.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
This Tosser[^] needs ejection!
Look at his posts.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
I was very curious, but the member is already dead 
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
torpedoed, sunk, no more.
|
|
|
|
|
Please have a look to my other thread, just above this one (typos).
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
I've psotted that thread earlier already, maybe it will be fixed in the next release, which I expect later today. But there are no guarantees!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, from time to time users repost their question when they are not satisfied with the answers. If you have this deja-vu effect and click on a users name, it's easy to spot reposts. What is the (community) recommended way to handle it?
I marked subjects with [Repost] and linked to the old one, someone else preferred to delete the question?
Thanks
/M
|
|
|
|
|
I delete them.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I'd add a comment to the question directing the user to the original post and then delete the question.
|
|
|
|
|
Any suggestion for the members without license to kill?
|
|
|
|
|
You can add a comment as well and/or down-vote and/or flag.
|
|
|
|
|
Please can I have my own forum/room totally devoted to me, where the same group of people can come to read my views/have general discussions about me/and ridicule and generally bully me. Then, if for some reason I dont post for two or three days, the aforementioned members can start 'baiting' threads specifically designed to entice me into posting again so the whole process can start all over again and make me feel even more special about myself, because all these supposedly intelligent members appear to have a hole in their lives, when they don't have interaction with me.
I only ask as CaptainSeeSharp has this so why can't I?
|
|
|
|
|
You already have one. Look at the bottom of your profile page.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
That was my first idea when I read the message; however I don't see his blog at all. Does it need enabling? Is there a minimal something required rep-wise??
|
|
|
|
|
My point was that the backroom just seems to be a CSS baiting/bullying room and if he doesn't post for a few days, someone will start a thread along the lines of CSS is a so-and-so, or my personal favourite is, when he hasn't posted for awhile someone will say CSS would say 'this', its like they can't live without him.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're reporting the fact that the whole thing is totally lame, then yes, we agree.
However, if the trollers and trollees need their fix then I'd rather them do it there than in the Lounge.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was BryanWilkins[^] who came up with this idea, but since he hasn't raised it here, I thought I would.
When you view an article, at the top of the screen is the "Quick Answers" button, as normal. It might be an idea to change this: We seem to be getting a lot of QA questions on articles and it would appear that newbies are reading an article (hallelujah!) and asking a question about it with the QA button, instead of the "New Message" button at the bottom. Obviously, this just clogs up QA and doesn't get the question to the article author unless someone is really lucky.
Perhaps we either need the QA button removed in articles, or a pop-up like "Are you sure you want a Quick Answer? Using the New Message will get you a quicker answer from the article author."
Did you know:
That by counting the rings on a tree trunk, you can tell how many other trees it has slept with.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: "Are you sure you want a Quick Answer? Using the New Message will get you a quicker answer from the article author."
I want a slow answer, I'm not familiar with this subject at all. 
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: I want a slow answer you to write my app for me, I'm not familiar with this subject at all.
FTFY!
Did you know:
That by counting the rings on a tree trunk, you can tell how many other trees it has slept with.
|
|
|
|
|
I think a popup message would be appropriate. New visitors are sometimes not aware there is such a thing as an article forum.
|
|
|
|
|
How about, when they hover over the Quick Answers link, we have an extra prominent link "Ask a question about this article" that redirects to the message posting page
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Not a bad idea, if it is the first in the list that could work.
Did you know:
That by counting the rings on a tree trunk, you can tell how many other trees it has slept with.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
Now with 24% more Twitter
