|
Is Chris opening up to exploit this[^]? Is this his lucrative new sideline - Hamsters XXX - Over 18s only?
|
|
|
|
|
Now there's a reason to go the VM way.
|
|
|
|
|
At a first I felt of COLOR BLINDNESS .
Asked near employee for confirmation.
It irritates.
Regards,
Hiren.
"The more we give of anything, the more we shall get back." - Grace Speare
(you can consider this quote while giving vote also)
Microsoft Dynamics CRM
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: on Chrome, left navigation pane shows mostly purple links
Gah! My eyes! The goggles, they do nothing!
Hope this is a bug and not the "new look"
|
|
|
|
|
I'm afraid it is part of the solution here[^], some wokring feature that ceased working and now got fixed. It is OK again there, but now it is bad manywhere else.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: on IE7 all is well
Not so on IE 8
Any previous visited link is purple now(which for Q&A was helpful/fine), but now even left navigation pane links (& any other visited link)!
|
|
|
|
|
I assume it is a feature, but if so, please could we have a less strident colour? I hated magenta when EGA was all we had, and my attitude to it hasn't improved...
Or some way to configure the colours, so we can ditch it if we want. (And I do want.)
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, all is well now.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
I was looking at the source for the Who's Who page, and found an errors/issues in the HTML.
0) This element - <span id="ctl00_MC_MR_ctl00_P_Status"> - contains a table that is missing the first <tr> tag. This makes it pretty much impossible to parse the page with the .Net framework's XML parsing functionality.
1) You're violating the HTML standard that by placing a <table> within a <span> element.
2) I don't know if this is intentional or not, but the ID's you're using are being incremented by 2 instead of by 1 (I expected them to be incremented by 1). For instance, I searched on Reputation, and Christin is listed 1st, me 2nd, and so on. The IDs for the elements for Christian are all ctl00. The ones for me are ctl02, and for Pete, they're ctl04, and so on.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
modified on Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I'll fix the first and leave you to puzzle, worridly, about the second.
There is a deep and mystical reason for it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've checked his account and even logged to his account and the New Message button is there. I'll contact him.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Discussions
News
All
these 3 tabs are clean as white paper Discussions and News can be empty but why All is. It suppose to show all.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
-----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Looks fine for me
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Select ASP.Net
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
-----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Works like a charm for me.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
haha, you must have fixed it. It wasn't working. Nothing was appearing when clicking on those tabs.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
-----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
What browser?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Opera 10.63, its working now.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
-----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
I understand that you need to accept ads that flash, shake, wobble and basically try and get our attention, after all hamsters need feeding.
But please, the Insider ad flashing in the Lounge is just plain irritating. One of the reasons I like the site is I can come here, get a chuckle read some interesting info and am subject to limited flashing ads.
Didn't you do a survey on these?
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Which ones in particular? Let me know and I'lllook into getting replacements.
I hate annoying ads too.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Bottom left in the Lounge, underneath the GIT link.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
The CodeProject Insider ad? That's ours. I can tone it down if it's a problem.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I'll second the motion. It might not be blinkier than some of the page top ads, but it's more annoying since it doesn't get scrolled out of sight in a few seconds.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Is there some way to tell who has approved an article for publishing? I've seen quite a few cases where comments have been added asking the author to make improvements, or where the article was not deemed appropriate, yet it shows up as approved anyway. Could we trend who is making approvals?
It's not a perfect world and there will always be issues but at least having someone take, or be forced to take, responsibility for their actions I think would improve the quality of the articles being approved and the site in general.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|