|
And where would this 'Rollback' button be located?
Because I'm not seeing it.
|
|
|
|
|
Below the question is the line 'Posted ... Edited ... v<num>' where <num> specifies the version. This is a link that opens the revision history.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I knew that but it's the 'Rollback' button I can't find.
|
|
|
|
|
It is in the righmost column of the revision table. But maybe it is only available when you have enough rep points for specific sections (author in your case).
|
|
|
|
|
I only have
Compare Revision Minor Date Status Editor
So probably a rights thing.
Bit confusing tho, I can edit/delete the question but I can't rollback a question.
|
|
|
|
|
Go to the question click on the v4 link and you should see all the revisions, with a Rollback button in the last column for each of the older versions.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Not there for me, see my answer to Jochen
|
|
|
|
|
You're only a bronze editor - it make take silver or higher.
But it shouldn't take too long - you are half way there!
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
|
|
|
|
|
But I'm a bronze editor, and I see the Rollback button.
In some cases, my signature will be longer then my message...
ProgramFOX
|
|
|
|
|
It may be your authorship then - I can't see any other difference in your profiles.
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
|
|
|
|
|
It probably is that but I don't see what authorship has to do with being able to rollback a change on a question.
If I'm able to edit / delete the question I should also be able to rollback a question.
My guess is the revision page for questions is using the same code as the revision page for articles (or maybe only the table) and thus the authorship rights are (incorrectly) used.
|
|
|
|
|
You can use a "bypass" for that. Go to the version you mean, copy it, edit the question and paste the content of the older version. Update and done.
It is not a rollback, but at the end is the same result.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I know but that takes a lot more time than just being able to press a rollback button
|
|
|
|
|
Lazy
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it has to do with "Author" points, because ProgramFox can see the moderated articles while I can't. (We already spoke about that because of spam-articles reports)
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but I notice that your reputation score is higher than his, so I am a bit confused as to why he can see them but you cannot.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Authorship - ProgramFox[^] sees it as well, and his profile is otherwise very similar.
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
|
|
|
|
|
That looks about right.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
See the answer I gave to OriginalGriff some messages above
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, Griff already figured it was that.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, maybe it was generosity, but I guess I should have gotten 25 and not a 100:
20 Dec 2012 6:15 PM 100 Authority Answer Accepted Answer 4 How to migrate from Bash to PowerShell: find . -name '*.xml' | xargs tar -czvf data.tgz
|
|
|
|
|
It was Answer 4 - I thought you knew they multiplied the answer number by the points?
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
|
|
|
|
|
And here I always thought the algorithm intended to arrive at a mean value of 42
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I thought you knew they multiplied the answer number by the points?
Is that for real?
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
24 Dec 2012 11:43 AM 50 Authority Answer Accepted Answer 1 Multiple foreign keys in a table referencing the same primary key another table
I guess CP Santa has started giving away points on Christmas eve
|
|
|
|