|
ppolymorphe wrote: I already said that anonymous downvoting is harmful. Yes, but it happens, and we just have to live with it. Seriously, downvoting does you absolutely no harm, and there is no way to stop it happening. This subject has been discussed at length in this forum and it is not going to change.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: Seriously, downvoting does you absolutely no harm At least to reputation.
Richard MacCutchan wrote: This subject has been discussed at length in this forum and it is not going to change. Sure, but still no fun.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see a question here. Your answer was downvoted. Before assuming maliciousness think that it may have been a considered judgement. Everything is possible. What policy could there be? Very poor answers can be accepted sometimes against very good answers. It is all part of the mix.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
modified 20-Jul-15 1:13am.
|
|
|
|
|
pwasser wrote: I don't see a question here. This is the question
ppolymorphe wrote: Did I break a rule or someone is downvoting just for pleasure ?
I think I just understood the underlying principle:
I suspect downvoting a solution is used to promote another (or own) solution. May be only upvoting should be allowed for solutions.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
ppolymorphe wrote: May be only upvoting should be allowed for solutions.
That would lead to a situation where the "best" answers are those posted by members who have the most mates / sock-puppets, and the correct answers are drowned out by the rubbish.
People are entitled to express their opinion of your solutions. That opinion will not always be positive. If you can't cope with that, the only winning move is not to play.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: That would lead to a situation where the "best" answers are those posted by members who have the most mates / sock-puppets, and the correct answers are drowned out by the rubbish. Just the same as today, but today they can also downvote other answers.
Today, answering a quick question, which is done on voluntary, is a risky business which can have a negative result on your reputation.
Richard Deeming wrote: If you can't cope with that, the only winning move is not to play. Calm down Joshua.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Is it normal that when a quick question is downvoted, reputation point are also removed on answers ?
The question have just been downvoted but not my answer. But my reputation just lost points
How to draw a transparent line in Direct2D[^]
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
modified 18-Jul-15 16:32pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like my answer was downvoted 1 hour after I lost the reputation points.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
No, a question downvote does not downvote the answers.
ppolymorphe wrote: The question have just been downvoted but not my answer. But my reputation just lost points
I think it's caching here: your answer got downvoted and you lost the points, but the stars on your answer weren't yet updated, because of caching.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
In my Answer here:
not able to find elements with Descendants key words: XML->LINQ-C# Answer 1[^]
The URL in a quoted string in the pre tagged code is being reformatted into an active HTML a tag. It is not being done correctly. (I don't think it needs to at all. I can make links explicitly. At least in pre .)
I had to make a hacky code change to keep it from being messed up...
It doesn't attempt any reformatting inside of code tags.
"Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed."
- G.K. Chesterton
|
|
|
|
|
When you hover the mouse over the "let this through" button in QA moderation, the tooltip that appears spells "post" as "psot":
"This is perfectly acceptable psot. Display the psot"
(And I just noticed the "Trash it" tooltip as well!)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
And its one of the few ordering of the letters that doesn't spell something
|
|
|
|
|
At least I'm consistent. Misspelled it 4 time the same way.
|
|
|
|
|
That's copy and paste for you!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, I kept typing it incorrectly when trying to correct it.
I must have done this before my morning coffee(s), like this morning.
|
|
|
|
|
I once misspelled the a word the exact same way 23 times before I got it right, so don't feel bad.
Spell check actually accepted the error. (I was using Word. Spell Check there is horrible)
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
What does an Insomniac, Agnostic, Dyslexic do?
Stays up all night and wonders if there is a Dog.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
As regulars in Spam & Abuse Watch probably have noticed, I have started hunting people who put spam in their biography, with the help of a small tool I created.
However, I'm fairly sure I cannot catch them all, because I rely on the Who's Who pages, and there are quite a lot of new pages in a day, so I thought it might be a good idea to have a filter in place to avoid this kind of spam, just like for messages and questions.
My suggestions:
- Only allow people to put something in their biography when they have their email address confirmed. I don't know how many spammers confirm an email address, but if I had to guess, I'd say it's a low amount.
- Have a spam filter for biographies, just like for messages and questions. There are several types of spam in biographies that always come back, so a filter could do a good job here.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
The filter idea is a good one - but I'm not sure about the email. I noticed that most (nearly all) of the spammers you have picked up yesterday and today have given an avatar picture (in order to seem more "real" I assume) and if they bother to do that, it's trivial to confirm the email address.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
True, that's a good point.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
I suggested who's who filters for having a biography and having a homepage set some time ago.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
May I have my account deleted.
|
|
|
|
|
You can close it yourself:
Look in the top right of this page, and hover the mouse over your username.From the menu that appears, select "My Settings".The settings page is organised into tabs: pick the "Account" tab.On the right side of the page, under your avatar picture (if any) there is a checkbox "Close my account"Check this, and a dialog will appear: "Are you sure? Once you deactivate your account you will lose access to your posts, articles and data." Select "OK".Make sure "I have read and agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service for this site" is also checked, and press the "Save my Settings" button.Your account is gone.Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
This should get a stickie
|
|
|
|
|